Omega Owners Forum

Omega Help Area => Omega General Help => Topic started by: JamesV6CDX on 26 February 2007, 20:35:14

Title: More awful MPGs
Post by: JamesV6CDX on 26 February 2007, 20:35:14
My 2.0 16v, I have calculated is averaging 21MPG with combined town / a road driving. I know they're not the most economical, but this seems excessive.

I've cleaned out throttle body, all breathers are cleaned out, new plugs, fuel, air and oil filters done.

Any ideas welcome...
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: Craig_R on 26 February 2007, 21:13:12
Only two things I can think of but you would get an error are

The air intake temp sensor and the lambda

Craig
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: DaveL on 26 February 2007, 21:14:19
Foot, lead, springs to mind. ;D

My 2.2 averages 25 around town, fitted with auto box.
 Long journey, Scotland to Devon, averages 36 -38.

I have tried slip streaming old ladies on zimmer frames and the variety of British Racing Green Tractors that we have in my neck of the woods.

Could just need a good old fashioned service. :)
 8-)
DaveL
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: Elite Pete on 26 February 2007, 21:15:39
Or you could have your empties in the boot from Saturday night ;) ;D
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: tunnie on 26 February 2007, 21:36:21
21mpg  :o

Something not right there for an average!! Driving to Nottingham in the Senny at very high speed, including several runs to high 3 figures, on the private runway... it averaged 26mpg...

My 2.2 did 35mpg average on the way back to Uni on Sunday (cruise set @ 80)

Getting any error codes?

Tyre pressure?

Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: TheBoy on 26 February 2007, 21:39:43
Any brake bind?
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: DaveL on 26 February 2007, 21:46:23
No just a snapping sat nav called the other half. ;D ;D
 8-)
DaveL

Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: JamesV6CDX on 26 February 2007, 22:07:34
Ok, no fauld codes, I've already checked all of this :(

Jacked up each corner, no brake bind obvious

Engine's had a damn good service..

And what do you take me for Tunnie?  ;) I check my tyre pressures weekly  ;D




Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: tunnie on 26 February 2007, 23:03:03
Quote
And what do you take me for Tunnie?  ;) I check my tyre pressures weekly  ;D

Just checking, I should do the 2.2 soon  ::)

Problem like on the old car, leaking tank? Fuel leak maybe?

Having said that we had it running in my garage for ages, no obvious smell of petrol  :-/
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: Martin_1962 on 26 February 2007, 23:12:11
Mine used to get 22 commuting with a heavy right foot.

Over 30 on a moderate run, high 20s at 80mph, and running on Shell it used to get 20mpg towing on the Somerset levels! (but 16 in Devon Cornwall)

On the 2.6 gauge says 14.xmpg filling up says over 16mpg. More economical towing on motorway than commuting!!!! So check at the pump not the MID

I need to richen it a bit I think to get the emmisions light out.

And

I must stop thrashing
I must stop thrashing
I must stop thrashing
I must stop thrashing
I must stop thrashing
I must stop thrashing

Oh stuff it they sound nice over 5000rpm

Anyway so your tyres pressures are OK, brakes OK, serviced, leads OK? driving OVER 50mph?

For economy keep it at mid to high 50s avoid acceleration and braking, and polish it!

Try Shell petrol as well, also run some injector cleaner through

You could do the axle and gearbox oils?
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: Taxi_Driver on 27 February 2007, 07:01:43
Carnt remember if its auto or manual...... :-[

Manual then id say its definately thirsty.....

My 2.2 averages 20ish on lpg......and i boot mine most of the time.....i have too....its a bit lacking on power.

Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: Martin_1962 on 27 February 2007, 10:19:53
His is an auto
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: JamesV6CDX on 27 February 2007, 18:10:14
My checks are based on calculations at the pump, rather than the MID.

Can't always keep over 50 in the town  ;D but otherwise yes!
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: theolodian on 27 February 2007, 18:41:31
If no DTC's then it may be coolant sensor problem, staying in warm-up enrichment.  Dunno about 4cyls, but different sensors for ECU and dash on V6.
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: Taxi_Driver on 27 February 2007, 20:18:24
Quote
His is an auto

Ah rite....cheers  :y

I would agree with davel then......25mpg av is probably about rite for an auto
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: Marks DTM Calib on 28 February 2007, 08:46:39
Start with the basics.

1) The engine is getting upto temp?
2) The airfilter is clean

Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: The Barge Captain on 28 February 2007, 14:08:56
My Missus has got my Omega's average down to 23 mpg commuting for an average of 30 minutes over 6 miles each way to work!
(2.5 manual)
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: bob.dent on 28 February 2007, 14:20:38
Seems very excessive for a 2.0 James. I normally get between 25-27 mpg urban/town and 31-32 mpg on motorway/long run from my 2.5 V6 estate, although it is manual.
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: JamesV6CDX on 28 February 2007, 18:14:53
Quote
Start with the basics.

1) The engine is getting upto temp?
2) The airfilter is clean


Airfilter was renewed when I got the car a couple of weeks ago

As far as getting up to temp goes, it's hard to tell, because the temp gauge only works when it feels like it  ;D
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: TheBoy on 28 February 2007, 18:39:24
I wonder if the wrong washers have been used on coolant bridge, causing bad earth....  ....iirc, the ecu is too old so cannot tech2 it...
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: JamesV6CDX on 28 February 2007, 18:44:54
Quote
I wonder if the wrong washers have been used on coolant bridge, causing bad earth....  ....iirc, the ecu is too old so cannot tech2 it...

You are right about the ECU

Interestingly, I filled it to the top again last night, still on Tesco99. I since did a run home, about 7 miles in heavy stop/start traffic, and 65 miles on the Motorway between 70-80mph..  

When I got back to Gloucs I filled up with Tesco99 again, and it cost me exactly £7.70 to do 72.2 miles, which is 37.7mpg.. (MID said 38.5).. these are closer to the figures I would expect....

Weird!!!
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: theolodian on 28 February 2007, 22:32:19
To expand on TB's comments, check your ground connections?  Block, engine loom, etc.
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: Kevin Wood on 28 February 2007, 23:07:19
Quote
When I got back to Gloucs I filled up with Tesco99 again, and it cost me exactly £7.70 to do 72.2 miles, which is 37.7mpg.. (MID said 38.5).. these are closer to the figures I would expect....
 
Weird!!!

I wonder if you got a dose of the contaminated fuel as well? Didn't make such a dramatic difference to fuel consumption on my car but on a different engine management system it might have. In fact, as yours didn't throw up a fault light maybe it indicates that the limits are wider and it carried on winding the correction up rather than going back to base values and barfing a fault code?

Guess we'll never know.

Kevin
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: JamesV6CDX on 28 February 2007, 23:09:23
Quote
Quote
When I got back to Gloucs I filled up with Tesco99 again, and it cost me exactly £7.70 to do 72.2 miles, which is 37.7mpg.. (MID said 38.5).. these are closer to the figures I would expect....
 
Weird!!!

I wonder if you got a dose of the contaminated fuel as well? Didn't make such a dramatic difference to fuel consumption on my car but on a different engine management system it might have. In fact, as yours didn't throw up a fault light maybe it indicates that the limits are wider and it carried on winding the correction up rather than going back to base values and barfing a fault code?

Guess we'll never know.

Kevin

Who knows... I'm going to run this tank to the bottom.. and it's going to be OPTIMAX from then on!
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: JamesV6CDX on 28 February 2007, 23:12:47
That is.. until I'm running on LPG ;D
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: paolo on 01 March 2007, 22:01:44
my 3.0 elite gets 17 to 18 locally..lots of hills, short journeys....on a run, it can really rise....it loves motorway journeys, with cruise control, and gets to around 29 mpg

Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: JamesV6CDX on 01 March 2007, 22:03:31
Quote
my 3.0 elite gets 17 to 18 locally..lots of hills, short journeys....on a run, it can really rise....it loves motorway journeys, with cruise control, and gets to around 29 mpg


On a steady motorway run, I'd want more than 29........
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: TheBoy on 01 March 2007, 22:05:31
Quote
Quote
my 3.0 elite gets 17 to 18 locally..lots of hills, short journeys....on a run, it can really rise....it loves motorway journeys, with cruise control, and gets to around 29 mpg


On a steady motorway run, I'd want more than 29........
My 3.0l on a steady motorway run is low 30s.  Apparently, on run, Inst Cons should be reading low 40s at 70mph on 2.0l
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: Martin_1962 on 01 March 2007, 22:57:12
Quote
Quote
Quote
my 3.0 elite gets 17 to 18 locally..lots of hills, short journeys....on a run, it can really rise....it loves motorway journeys, with cruise control, and gets to around 29 mpg


On a steady motorway run, I'd want more than 29........
My 3.0l on a steady motorway run is low 30s.  Apparently, on run, Inst Cons should be reading low 40s at 70mph on 2.0l

Apart from not going that slow I rarely got over 40 instant on mine except on overrun.

The 2.0s aren't THAT economical. BEtter than V6s but not hugely better
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: JamesV6CDX on 01 March 2007, 23:02:53
my 2.0 Gets 36mpg on a run, and about 22mpg knocking around.. big difference...
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: ians on 01 March 2007, 23:30:47
For the record I generally get over 500 miles on my 2.0 before the light comes on - mixed driving.
Think that's c. 35mpg

My 2.5 long term average (because I haven't reset the computer) is 30.0 exactly.

Cheers

Ian
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: dodgy154 on 01 March 2007, 23:41:59
i seem to be getting around 32 on my daily commute now, it was doing around 27/28 until i noticed the tracking was out ( the steering was VERY light - like torque steer on a front wheel drive car)
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: tunnie on 01 March 2007, 23:52:34
Quote
i seem to be getting around 32 on my daily commute now, it was doing around 27/28 until i noticed the tracking was out ( the steering was VERY light - like torque steer on a front wheel drive car)

Is yours a Manual? You might want to speak to Omegatoy about getting it chipped  :y
Title: Re: More awful MPGs
Post by: dodgy154 on 02 March 2007, 00:36:26
Quote
Quote
i seem to be getting around 32 on my daily commute now, it was doing around 27/28 until i noticed the tracking was out ( the steering was VERY light - like torque steer on a front wheel drive car)

Is yours a Manual? You might want to speak to Omegatoy about getting it chipped  :y

its an auto. just got over a overheating problem - valve stuck open on the cap ,  so the system wasn't pressurising, so the  mileage average could be higher (can hope cant i ?)
was thinking about a chip, but the cost is putting me off at the moment, have noticed superchips wanting £511 fitted! this is money i would rather ( no offence ment) be spending on the other car.
but then again .........  ::)