Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: JamesV6CDX on 20 January 2008, 22:30:22

Title: Good old Miggy
Post by: JamesV6CDX on 20 January 2008, 22:30:22
330 miles tonight to Daventry and back. Running on petrol all the way there and back.

Motorway speeds in excess of 80mph, not being too careful with the right foot, I got an average of 29.7mpg according to the MID.

Tank was about 3/4 when I left - when I pulled up after getting back, range was "2" miles  ::) .. the petrol light came on at Ross on Wye, Started flashing before I got to the Coldra, and running on fumes by Cardiff  ;D

(I wanted to empty the tank, as the stuff in there must have been getting stale)...
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: theolodian on 20 January 2008, 22:33:13
Quote
330 miles tonight to Daventry and back. Running on petrol all the way there and back.

Motorway speeds in excess of 80mph, not being too careful with the right foot, I got an average of 29.7mpg according to the MID.

Tank was about 3/4 when I left - when I pulled up after getting back, range was "2" miles  ::) .. the petrol light came on at Ross on Wye, Started flashing before I got to the Coldra, and running on fumes by Cardiff  ;D

(I wanted to empty the tank, as the stuff in there must have been getting stale)...
FFS, Chaventry?  ::) ;D
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: JamesV6CDX on 20 January 2008, 22:34:43
Quote
Quote
330 miles tonight to Daventry and back. Running on petrol all the way there and back.

Motorway speeds in excess of 80mph, not being too careful with the right foot, I got an average of 29.7mpg according to the MID.

Tank was about 3/4 when I left - when I pulled up after getting back, range was "2" miles  ::) .. the petrol light came on at Ross on Wye, Started flashing before I got to the Coldra, and running on fumes by Cardiff  ;D

(I wanted to empty the tank, as the stuff in there must have been getting stale)...
FFS, Chaventry?  ::) ;D

Good excuse to go for a blast in the Meega, and pick up my N95  ::)
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: miggy on 20 January 2008, 22:48:04
Good old Miggy,,,,,,thought you were refering to me....then again i aint old.. ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: tunnie on 20 January 2008, 22:51:01
i have to be doing 90+ to average 29mpg in the 2.2!
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: Vamps on 20 January 2008, 22:52:52
Quote
Quote
Quote
330 miles tonight to Daventry and back. Running on petrol all the way there and back.

Motorway speeds in excess of 80mph, not being too careful with the right foot, I got an average of 29.7mpg according to the MID.

Tank was about 3/4 when I left - when I pulled up after getting back, range was "2" miles  ::) .. the petrol light came on at Ross on Wye, Started flashing before I got to the Coldra, and running on fumes by Cardiff  ;D

(I wanted to empty the tank, as the stuff in there must have been getting stale)...
FFS, Chaventry?  ::) ;D

Good excuse to go for a blast in the Meega, and pick up my N95  ::)

Is there no post down there then!!!!! :D :D :D
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: JamesV6CDX on 20 January 2008, 22:56:40
Quote
i have to be doing 90+ to average 29mpg in the 2.2!

I was!  ::)
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: TheBoy on 21 January 2008, 18:52:57
Quote
330 miles tonight to Daventry and back. Running on petrol all the way there and back.

Motorway speeds in excess of 80mph, not being too careful with the right foot, I got an average of 29.7mpg according to the MID.

Tank was about 3/4 when I left - when I pulled up after getting back, range was "2" miles  ::) .. the petrol light came on at Ross on Wye, Started flashing before I got to the Coldra, and running on fumes by Cardiff  ;D

(I wanted to empty the tank, as the stuff in there must have been getting stale)...
Those sort of speeds I tend to average 30+mpg in my 3.0l MV6 auto, so not sure something isn't quite right there  :-/
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: TheBoy on 21 January 2008, 18:53:34
Thinking about it though, is auto higher geared?
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: Jay w on 21 January 2008, 18:56:33
90 is just over 3500rpm on a 2.5
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: TheBoy on 21 January 2008, 19:04:08
Quote
90 is just over 3500rpm on a 2.5
ah yes, 2.5 has different diff....  ....thats why by mpg is better on a cruise...
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: JamesV6CDX on 21 January 2008, 19:16:51
Quote
Quote
90 is just over 3500rpm on a 2.5
ah yes, 2.5 has different diff....  ....thats why by mpg is better on a cruise...

You're right Jaime - the manual box seems to rev quite a bit higher in 5th, and the manual is definately more thirsty on a run...
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 21 January 2008, 19:18:09
Quote
Quote
Quote
90 is just over 3500rpm on a 2.5
ah yes, 2.5 has different diff....  ....thats why by mpg is better on a cruise...

You're right Jaime - the manual box seems to rev quite a bit higher in 5th, and the manual is definately more thirsty on a run...


but still I want manual ;)
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: Taxi_Driver on 21 January 2008, 19:40:39
Quote
330 miles tonight to Daventry and back. Running on petrol all the way there and back.

Motorway speeds in excess of 80mph, not being too careful with the right foot, I got an average of 29.7mpg according to the MID.

Tank was about 3/4 when I left - when I pulled up after getting back, range was "2" miles  ::) .. the petrol light came on at Ross on Wye, Started flashing before I got to the Coldra, and running on fumes by Cardiff  ;D

(I wanted to empty the tank, as the stuff in there must have been getting stale)...

I woulnt worry about that.....you still use it up......i go through about £20/month.......just on starting.....and occasionally running out of LPG.
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: Paul M on 22 January 2008, 11:41:50
Quote
Thinking about it though, is auto higher geared?

Yes. They usually are, to help the fuel economy (which takes a hammering while the torque convertor is unlocked). Manuals tend to be geared more for acceleration, the 2.5 even more so due to the lower power than the 3.0.

So yes, you can get better economy with an auto sitting at a constant motorway speed with the torque converter locked out. You'd need to do a lot of that type of cruising to make up for what you lose in town and during acceleration though.
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: JamesV6CDX on 22 January 2008, 13:19:49
My 2.5 auto did 38mpg on a run, my 2.5 manual only about 30...
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: zippo on 22 January 2008, 17:54:16
so whats the average mpg for a v6 aound town then
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: Kevin Wood on 22 January 2008, 18:29:39
Fortunately I don't go "around town" too much - and I certainly don't look at the MID when I do :o

It all depends how you drive it, to an even greater extent with urban driving. If you give it a good squirt whenever you pull away it'll certainly be sub-20. Driven carefully you might better 20 MPG, I'd say. As mentined, this is when autos are a bit more thirsty, but they are a lot less aggro in traffic so worth it IMHO.

Kevin
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: zippo on 22 January 2008, 19:04:04
Quote
Fortunately I don't go "around town" too much - and I certainly don't look at the MID when I do :o

It all depends how you drive it, to an even greater extent with urban driving. If you give it a good squirt whenever you pull away it'll certainly be sub-20. Driven carefully you might better 20 MPG, I'd say. As mentined, this is when autos are a bit more thirsty, but they are a lot less aggro in traffic so worth it IMHO.

Kevin
 the reason i ask is that i get a 2.2 auto tomorrow and iam gonna be really pi$$ed if theres not much difference
in mpg around town (when i could've had a v6)
  darren
















Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: JamesV6CDX on 22 January 2008, 19:05:20
Quote
Quote
Fortunately I don't go "around town" too much - and I certainly don't look at the MID when I do :o

It all depends how you drive it, to an even greater extent with urban driving. If you give it a good squirt whenever you pull away it'll certainly be sub-20. Driven carefully you might better 20 MPG, I'd say. As mentined, this is when autos are a bit more thirsty, but they are a lot less aggro in traffic so worth it IMHO.

Kevin
 the reason i ask is that i get a 2.2 auto tomorrow and iam gonna be really pi$$ed if theres not much difference
in mpg around town (when i could've had a v6)
  darren

















The silky smooth V6 has a MUCH better all round MPG than the rough old 4 pot, in my opinion  :-X

Sorry mate  :'(
Title: Re: Good old Miggy
Post by: zippo on 22 January 2008, 19:11:27
Quote
Quote
Quote
Fortunately I don't go "around town" too much - and I certainly don't look at the MID when I do :o

It all depends how you drive it, to an even greater extent with urban driving. If you give it a good squirt whenever you pull away it'll certainly be sub-20. Driven carefully you might better 20 MPG, I'd say. As mentined, this is when autos are a bit more thirsty, but they are a lot less aggro in traffic so worth it IMHO.

Kevin
 the reason i ask is that i get a 2.2 auto tomorrow and iam gonna be really pi$$ed if theres not much difference
in mpg around town (when i could've had a v6)
  darren

















The silky smooth V6 has a MUCH better all round MPG than the rough old 4 pot, in my opinion  :-X

Sorry mate  :'(
o no find me a rope quick [smiley=cry.gif]