Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Nickbat on 12 January 2012, 19:56:32

Title: Channel 5 at 8
Post by: Nickbat on 12 January 2012, 19:56:32
World's scariest landings

Looks interesting! :y :y
Title: Re: Channel 5 at 8
Post by: millwall on 12 January 2012, 19:57:46
i will be watching :y
Title: Re: Channel 5 at 8
Post by: Omega_Dan on 12 January 2012, 20:02:10
Quote from: millwall on 12 January 2012, 19:57:46
i will be watching :y

Likewise. Looks a decent watch :)
Title: Re: Channel 5 at 8
Post by: jtypecav on 12 January 2012, 20:26:14
Tuning in now.. anygood so far?!
Title: Re: Channel 5 at 8
Post by: Andy B on 12 January 2012, 20:27:26
A whole new meaning to getting a flat tyre!!!  :o :o :o

It must show Chesley landing on the Hudson  :y :y
Title: Re: Channel 5 at 8
Post by: SIR Philbutt on 12 January 2012, 20:46:14
So glad i've got a mig and dont have to leave the ground  :D :D :D
Title: Re: Channel 5 at 8
Post by: Nickbat on 12 January 2012, 21:08:48
Quite good, but partly spoiled by the complete numpty in the production suite that thought it would terribly good to try every cheesy effect in the video editing software.  Why do these halfwits think that screen splitting, constantly re-running clips, and and finishing each millisecond of video grab in a screen crackle in any way adds to the quality of the programme?  >:(

Oooh. Had a little rant there, didn't I?   ;)
Title: Re: Channel 5 at 8
Post by: Martian on 12 January 2012, 21:54:23
I think the worst landings I ever saw was that time those 2 planes crashed into two different buildings.
Title: Re: Channel 5 at 8
Post by: Andy B on 12 January 2012, 21:55:35
Quote from: Nickbat on 12 January 2012, 21:08:48
Quite good, but partly spoiled by the complete numpty in the production suite that thought it would terribly good to try every cheesy effect in the video editing software.  Why do these halfwits think that screen splitting, constantly re-running clips, and and finishing each millisecond of video grab in a screen crackle in any way adds to the quality of the programme?  >:(

Oooh. Had a little rant there, didn't I?   ;)

You're forgiven your mini rant ................ I agree.  ;D ;D
Another of these programmes where they tell you that they're going to show you blah blah blah, then show you blah blah blah and then finish off by telling you that they've just shown you blah blah blah.  ;) ;) ;)
Title: Re: Channel 5 at 8
Post by: redelitev6 on 12 January 2012, 22:08:13
 :o The Jumbo landing at St Maartens was well scary  :o :o
Title: Re: Channel 5 at 8
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 12 January 2012, 22:29:11
Quote from: Nickbat on 12 January 2012, 21:08:48
Quite good, but partly spoiled by the complete numpty in the production suite that thought it would terribly good to try every cheesy effect in the video editing software.  Why do these halfwits think that screen splitting, constantly re-running clips, and and finishing each millisecond of video grab in a screen crackle in any way adds to the quality of the programme?  >:(

Oooh. Had a little rant there, didn't I?   ;)

I'm surprised - it's not like you. :P

I do agree with you about the production values of many of these shows; it seems that the only way the attention of many people can be held nowadays is to have trick editing.