16
General Discussion Area / Re: Got new motor.
« on: 21 December 2015, 19:20:59 »Nice looking car the Alfa GT.
3.2 litre V6......
Derv......
Diesel sorry to say, its turbo charged and has a good turn of speed and cheap to fly around in.
- 06 June 2024, 01:39:43
- Welcome, Guest
News:
Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Diesel sorry to say, its turbo charged and has a good turn of speed and cheap to fly around in.
17
General Discussion Area / Got new motor.
« on: 21 December 2015, 18:34:29 »
Over the weekend i became the owner of this little baby, still got the mig but this baby is fun. Hope you like her.
18
General Discussion Area / Re: Mourinho!!!!
« on: 17 December 2015, 20:07:53 »Please dont let it be Tim Sherwood
Dell boy Tim now theres a thought, Mourinho for the Villa yes please.
19
General Discussion Area / Re: Xmas Decs
« on: 12 December 2015, 21:17:56 »
Thought i would decorate the old tree 
20
General Discussion Area / Re: That's disappointing
« on: 11 December 2015, 22:53:09 »
In the position my team are in i cant say a lot, but Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! love it.
21
General Discussion Area / Re: Gearbox Oil ??
« on: 06 December 2015, 15:00:41 »Hi could i ask what is the correct gearbox Oil for 2.6manuelManual thanks.
22
General Discussion Area / Gearbox Oil ??
« on: 06 December 2015, 13:58:33 »
Hi could i ask what is the correct gearbox Oil for 2.6 manuel thanks.
23
General Discussion Area / Its that time of year again
« on: 22 November 2015, 18:18:24 »
May i be the first to say Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr
24
General Discussion Area / Re: OOF Good Grub Guide
« on: 17 November 2015, 19:30:46 »
Will be venturing up that way in a few weeks time and have been told we will be paying a visit to La Porto Italiano in Billingham, have you tryed it would you recommend.
Have never been - do report back! Hazey and I are always looking for good grub that we can wander to, and call in the local on the way back...
How long you coming up for? Cuppas are always on offer if one of us is around...
Thanks for your offer, if i have time may well do. Not sure what my mate has planned for us as we are using our time for an early crimbo session.
Will give you a run down on the eatery.25
General Discussion Area / Re: OOF Good Grub Guide
« on: 16 November 2015, 18:02:56 »I think we need a guide to decent pubs, restaurants, cafes and takeaways.
If I may start with one for anyone near Hartlepool - Big Lou's cafe on York Road. Proper one man band, all fresh cooked, handmade burgers, lush breakfasts, proper brews. And, most importantly for a tight Northerner like me... Very cheap.
And for somewhere a little posher, Borge in Stockton. Has been there for years, we tried it yesterday. Beautiful food, great service, and excellent drinks menu. Again not to badly priced - we did three courses each and plenty of drinks for about fifty quid. And the creme brulee is to die for!
Will be venturing up that way in a few weeks time and have been told we will be paying a visit to La Porto Italiano in Billingham, have you tryed it would you recommend.
26
General Discussion Area / Re: Here we go again.....Paris terrorists
« on: 16 November 2015, 17:19:06 »
This clears it all up in a nutshell
Apologies for the long post but I think I've finally figured out what is happening in the Middle East:
President Assad (who is bad) is a nasty guy who got so nasty his people rebelled and the Rebels (who are good) started winning (Hurrah!). But then some of the rebels turned a bit nasty and are now called Islamic State ( who are definitely bad!) and some continued to support democracy (who are still good.)
So the Americans (who are good) started bombing Islamic State (who are bad) and giving arms to the Syrian Rebels (who are good) so they could fight Assad (who is still bad) which was good.
By the way, there is a breakaway state in the north run by the Kurds who want to fight IS ( which is a good thing ) but the Turkish authorities think they are bad, so we have to say they are bad whilst secretly thinking they're good and giving them guns to fight IS (which is good) but that is another matter.
Getting back to Syria.
So President Putin ( who is bad, cos he invaded Crimea and the Ukraine and killed lots of folks including that nice Russian man in London with polonium poisoned sushi ) has decided to back Assad (who is still bad) by attacking IS (who are also bad) which is sort of a good thing?
But Putin ( still bad ) thinks the Syrian Rebels (who are good) are also bad, and so he bombs them too, much to the annoyance of the Americans (who are good) who are busy backing and arming the rebels (who are also good).
Now Iran (who used to be bad, but now they have agreed not to build any nuclear weapons and bomb Israel are now good) are going to provide ground troops to support Assad (still bad) as are the Russians (bad) who now have ground troops and aircraft in Syria.
So a Coalition of Assad (still bad) Putin (extra bad) and the Iranians (good, but in a bad sort of way) are going to attack IS (who are bad) which is a good thing, but also the Syrian Rebels (who are good) which is bad.
Now the British (obviously good, except some freak called Corbyn who, incidentally wears a corduroy jacket, which is dead give away as that's never good) and the Americans (also good) cannot attack Assad (still bad) for fear of upsetting Putin (bad) and Iran (good / bad) and now they have to accept that Assad might not be that bad after all compared to IS (who are super bad).
So Assad (bad) is now probably good, being better than IS (but let’s face it, drinking your own wee is better than IS so no real choice there) and since Putin and Iran are also fighting IS that may now make them Good. America (still Good) will find it hard to arm a group of rebels being attacked by the Russians for fear of upsetting Mr Putin (now good) and that nice mad Ayatollah in Iran (also Good) and so they may be forced to say that the Rebels are now Bad, or at the very least abandon them to their fate. This will lead most of them to flee to Turkey and on to Europe or join IS (still the only constantly bad group).
To Sunni Muslims, an attack by Shia Muslims (Assad and Iran) backed by Russians will be seen as something of a Holy War, and the ranks of IS will now be seen by the Sunnis as the only Jihadis fighting in the Holy War and hence many Muslims will now see IS as Good (Doh!)
Sunni Muslims will also see the lack of action by Britain and America in support of their Sunni rebel brothers as something of a betrayal (mmmm... might have a point) and hence we will be seen as Bad.
So now we have America (now bad) and Britain (also bad) providing limited support to Sunni Rebels (bad) many of whom are looking to IS (Good / bad) for support against Assad (now good) who, along with Iran (also Good) and Putin (also, now, unbelievably, Good) are attempting to retake the country Assad used to run before all this started?
I hope that clears all this up for you.
Apologies for the long post but I think I've finally figured out what is happening in the Middle East:
President Assad (who is bad) is a nasty guy who got so nasty his people rebelled and the Rebels (who are good) started winning (Hurrah!). But then some of the rebels turned a bit nasty and are now called Islamic State ( who are definitely bad!) and some continued to support democracy (who are still good.)
So the Americans (who are good) started bombing Islamic State (who are bad) and giving arms to the Syrian Rebels (who are good) so they could fight Assad (who is still bad) which was good.
By the way, there is a breakaway state in the north run by the Kurds who want to fight IS ( which is a good thing ) but the Turkish authorities think they are bad, so we have to say they are bad whilst secretly thinking they're good and giving them guns to fight IS (which is good) but that is another matter.
Getting back to Syria.
So President Putin ( who is bad, cos he invaded Crimea and the Ukraine and killed lots of folks including that nice Russian man in London with polonium poisoned sushi ) has decided to back Assad (who is still bad) by attacking IS (who are also bad) which is sort of a good thing?
But Putin ( still bad ) thinks the Syrian Rebels (who are good) are also bad, and so he bombs them too, much to the annoyance of the Americans (who are good) who are busy backing and arming the rebels (who are also good).
Now Iran (who used to be bad, but now they have agreed not to build any nuclear weapons and bomb Israel are now good) are going to provide ground troops to support Assad (still bad) as are the Russians (bad) who now have ground troops and aircraft in Syria.
So a Coalition of Assad (still bad) Putin (extra bad) and the Iranians (good, but in a bad sort of way) are going to attack IS (who are bad) which is a good thing, but also the Syrian Rebels (who are good) which is bad.
Now the British (obviously good, except some freak called Corbyn who, incidentally wears a corduroy jacket, which is dead give away as that's never good) and the Americans (also good) cannot attack Assad (still bad) for fear of upsetting Putin (bad) and Iran (good / bad) and now they have to accept that Assad might not be that bad after all compared to IS (who are super bad).
So Assad (bad) is now probably good, being better than IS (but let’s face it, drinking your own wee is better than IS so no real choice there) and since Putin and Iran are also fighting IS that may now make them Good. America (still Good) will find it hard to arm a group of rebels being attacked by the Russians for fear of upsetting Mr Putin (now good) and that nice mad Ayatollah in Iran (also Good) and so they may be forced to say that the Rebels are now Bad, or at the very least abandon them to their fate. This will lead most of them to flee to Turkey and on to Europe or join IS (still the only constantly bad group).
To Sunni Muslims, an attack by Shia Muslims (Assad and Iran) backed by Russians will be seen as something of a Holy War, and the ranks of IS will now be seen by the Sunnis as the only Jihadis fighting in the Holy War and hence many Muslims will now see IS as Good (Doh!)
Sunni Muslims will also see the lack of action by Britain and America in support of their Sunni rebel brothers as something of a betrayal (mmmm... might have a point) and hence we will be seen as Bad.
So now we have America (now bad) and Britain (also bad) providing limited support to Sunni Rebels (bad) many of whom are looking to IS (Good / bad) for support against Assad (now good) who, along with Iran (also Good) and Putin (also, now, unbelievably, Good) are attempting to retake the country Assad used to run before all this started?
I hope that clears all this up for you.
27
General Discussion Area / Re: Come on you reds
« on: 31 October 2015, 15:02:37 »
Would not want him to be fair, but would like to see him get the heave ho. No one is bigger than the club and all that. Glad to see teckers on the score sheet, Villa owe him big time so glad to see him doing well.
28
General Discussion Area / Re: Come on you reds
« on: 31 October 2015, 14:54:01 »
We have a vacancy. 
29
General Discussion Area / Re: Tim Sherwood
« on: 26 October 2015, 04:31:11 »
The weight of expectation in the Prem means he had to go, but i dont lay all the blame at his door. Our problems go deeper than the manager the chairmans running of the club in making all managers slash the wage bill and it isnt allowing the better players around to come in. Sad times ahead i fear. 
30
General Discussion Area / Re: Thoughts of Klopps first game
« on: 18 October 2015, 02:14:49 »
Klopps first game better than Tims first eight. . Think he will do well.
. Think he will do well.