Poor old DLT, its more of the same and will probably come to nothing other than a pack of lies.......
![Grin ;D](http://images.omegaowners.com/forum/smf2000/Smileys/oofstd/grin.gif)
STMO123 did not realise that Mr Blobby and his creator were the first done, but out of sight and sound.
![Cheesy :D](http://images.omegaowners.com/forum/smf2000/Smileys/oofstd/cheesy.gif)
and probably liked it.......
![Wink ;)](http://images.omegaowners.com/forum/smf2000/Smileys/oofstd/wink.gif)
I have said all along that this issue is now well and truly out of hand and that many, many celebs and others who attain a limelight spot will be harranged and hounded by those with a wish for a bit of the spotlight. It is the direct fault of the gutter press and the radio/TV news presenters/readers to a lesser extent because they are prompted what to say by the show producer via their earpieces. The press has now proven to one and all that it simply cannot be self regulated and should be brought into line by a single authority to hand out massive fines and penalties (mandatory jail of at least 12 months plus disbarment form any future role in the industry) to those who transgress. They should also make those employed as presenters, researchers and assistants fully liable in law for any errors they make which results in any innocent person (innocent UNTIL proven guilty remember) being named with the same penalties. Surely in this world there are many more newsworthy items worth reporting, or are they simply in it to cause as much uproar as they can for the five minutes of fame and a by-line.
On ITV's This Morning, Schofield (who appears to believe he is a god and answerable to no-one including his producers and show directors) made another massive balls up by once again yawping about something he had not the correct facts for and for making a written note visible to all viewers. It was his intention to disclose the content of that note to the viewers.
It has to be said about Schofield, that becuase of his love for the camera which he is constantly glancing for the active one while presenting, that he knew full well where the cameras were and were aimed. One day he and his like will hopefully find themselves on a wrong end of a very expensive law suit and for me that day cannot come soon enough. Maybe even one day he will not bully his lady co-presenter and allow her to have her own opinion too, but that is only wishful thinking. My good wife now watches the CH5 or CNN news again because she has gone right off her once idolised 'fancy man' Schofield. Personally I never did like his methods or, his obvious to me, latent femininity.
When can we expect to be able to watch the news as it used to be...(old sod
![Wink ;)](http://images.omegaowners.com/forum/smf2000/Smileys/oofstd/wink.gif)
), an honest discourse of the true facts and not these mostly unblievable stories of todays newsrooms for which the truth and fact now seem to be wholly irrelevant? Have we really reached the stage where it is only the press circulation figures, the radio listener numbers and TV viewer numbers that count?