Welcome to OOF
As I was doing a simple 2 colour print...Melt it down and use it again. And warn the printer you're going to do that every time until it eats all of it's dinner
The amount of waste printing the box sat on the keyboard. This is a simple 2 colour print, so only changes filament one per layer (that has 2 colours on if)
Very old man-ishI rarely use the contacts list in the phone, I still dial them manually for most of my friends and family. It's only those people I call rarely, and never remember their numbers that I dial from contactsI can understand that. Dad,s been gone over 10 years but I can still remember his number off the top of my head.I don't know anyone's number, I use their name. If I lost my phone, I'd be knackered
I can understand that. Dad,s been gone over 10 years but I can still remember his number off the top of my head.I don't know anyone's number, I use their name. If I lost my phone, I'd be knackered
Size of population is irrelevant. Its the principle of self determination that matters.We can always hope the Donald loses his majority in both houses in the mid terms.
It has been the bedrock of governance of the free world for a long time, and why the UK sent its forces to take back the Falklands, for example.
If the U.S. throws that in the bin it becomes another rogue state like Russia, Iran, Libya etc. etc.
Greenland has a population of around 56,000, mostly Eskimo. There is no army.Bomb MacDonalds
Trump doesn't need to invade.
I believe there is a small US military base there.
He can simply walk in and have a nice cup of tea.
The question is what would assorted European countries do if he did this?
It would constitute a moral issue if the present occupants didn't want to transfer control. Ask any Ukrainian.But they werent invaded then conquered for keeps.Perhaps, but it's not exactly a new idea...
They were just very stupid wars started by very stupid men.
Thee couldnt be any possible moral justification for Trump annexing Greenland.
A strategic one, maybe. But not a moral one.
Even if it was purely a strategic one, it would be proof positive that he doesnt recognise Nato at all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Failed_proposals_for_the_purchase_of_Greenland_by_the_United_States
Would a simple transfer of control really constitute a moral issue?
But they werent invaded then conquered for keeps.The man is a megalomaniac, a narcissist and not very nice.
They were just very stupid wars started by very stupid men.
Thee couldnt be any possible moral justification for Trump annexing Greenland.
A strategic one, maybe. But not a moral one.
Even if it was purely a strategic one, it would be proof positive that he doesnt recognise Nato at all.
Sounds like a criticism to me.Showing my age now but in my day A.I. stood for artificial insemination , very popular in farming
A lot of things changed
I.C.E use to In Car Entertainment.
Naturally Aspirated used the be car fitted with carbs but now fuel injected
Just an observation, not a criticism but, Naturally Aspirated (NA) was air drawn in by piston vacuum, as opposed to forced induction via turbo/supercharger, and was not relative to the way the fuel was supplied.
You do talk absolute shite sometimes. Trump derangement syndrome in reverse.Funny how it's normal behaviour when it applies anywhere else, but as soon as Donald is mentioned it becomes Trump Derangement SyndromeSort of fake news.Yep. Fake noos combined with Trump derangement syndrome
The consensus seems to be that it's ok to covertly break into Osama Bin Laden's house and shoot him in the face, but you can't overtly arrest a former dictator and extradite them to face trial.
I wonder if the US strategy is actually quite clever, if somewhat left field...
By making Venezuela a criminal state, it allows for some form of sanction or punishment to be imposed. Much like invading Iraq.Twice. The unspoken motivation is obviously energy control rather than drug trafficking, and in a world where China has effective control over everything else, is it really such a surprise?
Greenland is a very different proposition as it's purely a strategic defence concept and is effectively a barren wasteland that's being used for subsistence farming and military development testing. Transferring it from Denmark to the US would save Denmark a fair amount of cash without upsetting the status quo within NATO, yet the media seems hell bent on the mere suggestion becoming a declaration of war.
When I start impaling myself on gardenalia, I'll start worryingI thought you were a scouser, so surely its around 13-15 years?24, which is more than enough to see this world come to an end. Putin, Trump, global warming.........Yes, 24 is more than enough
24 years perhaps, but about 22 of those years you'll be dribbling into a beige cardigan with wooden buttons......while a young carer scrapes the bulk of your dinner from your lap.
And the bulk of the previous nights dinner off his arse.
You seem to be well informed about these things. Forward planning?I thought you were a scouser, so surely its around 13-15 years?24, which is more than enough to see this world come to an end. Putin, Trump, global warming.........Yes, 24 is more than enough
24 years perhaps, but about 22 of those years you'll be dribbling into a beige cardigan with wooden buttons......while a young carer scrapes the bulk of your dinner from your lap.
I thought you were a scouser, so surely its around 13-15 years?24, which is more than enough to see this world come to an end. Putin, Trump, global warming.........Yes, 24 is more than enough
