Personally, I would rather have the nuclear plant.
Where wind turbines are noisy, if you live near them, they can stop you receiving TV and mobile signals due to the rotating blades causing ghosting, they kill lots of birds that fly into the blades and only work 30% of the time, the other 70% has to be covered by base load power stations like, nuclear, gas and coal.
And they are very expensive for what they do with expensive maintenance schedules and breakdowns, which is why the electricity they generate is so expensive.
It would be far more sensible to spend the money on Thorium Liquid Sodium nuclear technology, like India (world leader), China and Russia are. The technology is orders of magnitude safer than Uranium reactors as they need a neutron beam to make the reactor work, turn that off and it stops, the liquid sodium can continue to circulate as a gravity feed, so a core meltdown is not possible with external pump failure (like in Japan). Once the fuel is fully used the major long lasting radiation by product is cesium137 which has a half live of 30 years (about 60%) of radiation gone, so it it safe to handle with no protection after about 30 years.
Where there is only enough left Uranium for about 100 years if most electricity was produced by them, there is over 1000 years of proven deposits of Thorium.
We were the world's leaders in civilian nuclear power in the 1950's. I don't know if anybody else has noticed, but this since the 1990's all UK Governments do not invest in developing world leading expensive technologies like this anymore.