Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Rods2]

Some scientists have discovered a cheap way to absorb CO2 and so make all expensive green CO2 saving technologies unnecessary. So how do you think this has been received by Governments with their Green scams?

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/timworstall/100018956/governments-arent-taking-climate-change-seriously-otherwise-theyd-investigate-this-possible-solution/

[Sir Tigger KC]

Interesting Rods!    I thought however that the red sludge in Hungary that he talks about was highly toxic!? 

Also I thought that one of the effects of climate change was the increasing acidity of the oceans, which has affected sealife, particulary shellfish as it affects their ability to build shells...... I wonder what the reactions of dumping tonnes of silicic acid in the sea would be? 

But as the article points out, if governments won't allow or fund research, then we'll probably never know! 

[Dishevelled Den]

So how do you think this has been received by Governments with their Green scams?

Hold up there Rodski - I hope you're not trying to give this far-seeing politican (and those of his ilk) any more stress than they seem to be having at the moment - after all, they're only looking out for themselves the environment.


Booker: the wrong House


http://www.eureferendum.com/blogview.aspx?blogno=82950



.........like a cross between Ebola and Chris Huhne


http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100172094/xxx-xxx-like-a-cross-between-ebola-and-chris-huhne/


Surely I can't be alone in thinking those in government and their associated running dogs (and bitches) in NGO's and other fancy outfits deserve to see the fruits of their labour rewarded (sometimes based on the juvenille/mendacious assessment of complicated science) without being obliged to endure such probing questions posed by a mere voter.