Did they CRASH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Should we only take action upon dangerous driving when it results in a collision? As KW has said, there's simply no margin for error - if someone pulls across without looking, which we all know happens with a regularity approaching inevitability.
I refer you to my earlier post - the technical skill of the drivers is excellent - notice how the following car takes a different route, rather than following blindly - but good driving on public roads isn't about handling skills and reaction time, its about attitude and safety margins. Safe, systematic, smooth, brisk progress with a bit of sparkle - not balls-out driving expecting every single other road user to do the right thing.
no matter how good u are , speed kills..
when the moment comes no brakes , no driving skills and no strong
engine can save you..
How do you define a safe speed to travel at? Are speed limits always an appropriate speed to travel at?
It's not the speed which is the problem here, its the red mist and the belief that every other road user is a model driver. All driving carries an element of risk, the objective of traffic law, and the enforcement thereof, is to minimise that risk. This simply cannot be done with speed limits alone. There are hundreds of factors that make a safe driver, sadly the overreliance on speed enforcement is aimed at protecting the average driver from themselves. If 95% of drivers on one road are travelling within 115% of the limit, that's a fairly level playing field. Throw two lunatics like those shown here into the mix, and that's when it can all go wrong...