Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Dissapointing omega  (Read 4672 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36452
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Dissapointing omega
« Reply #15 on: 19 January 2014, 10:24:36 »
I've always felt that 2.6s feel a bit flat to drive. The 3.2 is certainly more pokey.
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: Dissapointing omega
« Reply #16 on: 19 January 2014, 10:36:43 »
The Z22 isn't an Omega engine iirc, so either an Astra G/H, Zafira B or Vectra C, all of which weigh a damn sight less than an Omega, and are all geared for flying around ::)
Logged

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: Dissapointing omega
« Reply #17 on: 19 January 2014, 21:24:07 »
Quote from: mmcg on 18 January 2014, 20:57:34
Went to buy a 2.6 manual cdx to day .Very nice car but slower than expected are the all like that.

No mine used to break 8 seconds 0-60
Logged

mmcg

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • 0
  • Posts: 94
    • View Profile
Re: Dissapointing omega
« Reply #18 on: 19 January 2014, 22:30:40 »
The z22xe is an opel omega 02.
Logged

Vamps

  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bishop Middleham, Co Durham.
  • Posts: 24708
  • Flying Tonight, so Be Prepared.
    • Mig 2.6CDX and 2.2 Honda
    • View Profile
Re: Dissapointing omega
« Reply #19 on: 19 January 2014, 22:42:49 »
Quote from: mmcg on 18 January 2014, 20:57:34
Went to buy a 2.6 manual cdx to day .Very nice car but slower than expected are the all like that.

They go quite well when you are used to 2.0 and 2.2....... :D :D But maintenance costs much higher, any further Omega in this family will be a 2.2, more than adequate for our needs....... :y :y
Logged

omega3000

  • Guest
Re: Dissapointing omega
« Reply #20 on: 20 January 2014, 13:50:07 »
You need to try a superior 3.0 MV  :P
Logged

2boxerdogs

  • Guest
Re: Dissapointing omega
« Reply #21 on: 20 January 2014, 20:47:33 »
I must have a good one then, in Germany I have seen 125 mph with ease, everyone who has been in it comments on  how quick smooth & quiet  it is , have not ever been in a 3.2 so can't comment but my 2.6 is superb & certainly not a "slug"
Logged

Toledodude1973

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • IPSWICH U.K.
  • Posts: 1300
  • 2002 2.6 elite,1973 ,Gas van,1974 victor fe
    • 2.6 OMEGA ELITE 2002
    • View Profile
Re: Dissapointing omega
« Reply #22 on: 20 January 2014, 20:54:36 »
Totally agree Tilbo my 2.6 goes really quick,especially in sports mode!It feels as quick as my Astra GTE ever did, mind you that was the 80's
Logged
2002 omega slowly morphing into 2003 omega with increasing doner parts fitted

Andy B

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury Lancs
  • Posts: 39847
    • ML350 TDM SmartRoadster
    • View Profile
Re: Dissapointing omega
« Reply #23 on: 20 January 2014, 20:55:58 »
Quote from: Tilbo on 20 January 2014, 20:47:33
I must have a good one then, in Germany I have seen 125 mph with ease, .....

Quite slow then ......  ::)
Logged

Andy B

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury Lancs
  • Posts: 39847
    • ML350 TDM SmartRoadster
    • View Profile
Re: Dissapointing omega
« Reply #24 on: 20 January 2014, 20:57:14 »
Quote from: Toledodude1973 on 20 January 2014, 20:54:36
Totally agree Tilbo my 2.6 goes really quick,especially in sports mode!.....

Just nail it .... ie foot burried in the carpet, then it'll not make a difference whether it's in Sports or not  ;) ;)
Logged

2boxerdogs

  • Guest
Re: Dissapointing omega
« Reply #25 on: 20 January 2014, 21:02:41 »
Quote from: Andy B on 20 January 2014, 20:55:58
Quote from: Tilbo on 20 January 2014, 20:47:33
I must have a good one then, in Germany I have seen 125 mph with ease, .....

Quite slow then ......  :: )Compared to some of the AMG Mercs  yes.
Logged

Andy B

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury Lancs
  • Posts: 39847
    • ML350 TDM SmartRoadster
    • View Profile
Re: Dissapointing omega
« Reply #26 on: 20 January 2014, 22:01:19 »
Quote from: Tilbo on 20 January 2014, 21:02:41
Quote from: Andy B on 20 January 2014, 20:55:58

I must have a good one then, in Germany I have seen 125 mph with ease, .....

Quite slow then ......  :: )
Quote from: Tilbo on 20 January 2014, 20:47:33
Compared to some of the AMG Mercs  yes.


I'll let you know if I get an AMG Merc of some kind  ;) ;) ;)
Logged

Vamps

  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bishop Middleham, Co Durham.
  • Posts: 24708
  • Flying Tonight, so Be Prepared.
    • Mig 2.6CDX and 2.2 Honda
    • View Profile
Re: Dissapointing omega
« Reply #27 on: 20 January 2014, 23:02:49 »
Quote from: Andy B on 20 January 2014, 22:01:19
Quote from: Tilbo on 20 January 2014, 21:02:41
Quote from: Andy B on 20 January 2014, 20:55:58

I must have a good one then, in Germany I have seen 125 mph with ease, .....

Quite slow then ......  :: )
Quote from: Tilbo on 20 January 2014, 20:47:33
Compared to some of the AMG Mercs  yes.


I'll let you know if I get an AMG Merc of some kind  ;) ;) ;)

Or a Jeep, in a straight line............ :D :D :D
Logged

2woody

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Northumberland
  • Posts: 2374
    • View Profile
Re: Dissapointing omega
« Reply #28 on: 21 January 2014, 10:39:35 »
2.5 and 2.6 do both feel a bit flat compared to 3.0 and 3.2. They're just not really performance models
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 17 queries.