Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: When the undercarriage fails when landing a Harrier...  (Read 1280 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Rods2

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Sandhurst Berkshire
  • Posts: 7604
    • 1999 3.0 Elite Estate
    • View Profile
Logged
US Fracking and Saudi Arabia defending its market share = The good news of an oil glut, lower and lower prices for us and squeaky bum time for Putin!

hercules

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • sunnyudders
  • Posts: 1806
    • View Profile
Re: When the undercarriage fails when landing a Harrier...
« Reply #1 on: 27 June 2014, 17:51:24 »

if that had been a Yorkshire pilot he could of landed it on some wickets  ;)
Logged

ffcgary1

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Mitcham,Surrey.
  • Posts: 2805
  • I really must get my eyes seen to.
    • Omega Estate/ jaguar XJ6
    • View Profile
Re: When the undercarriage fails when landing a Harrier...
« Reply #2 on: 27 June 2014, 18:20:55 »

funny thing about this is, that stool is not a stool but a nose rig built to do the job, and how the most powerful air force in the world is still using a jet that the british designed and built, then scrapped 5 years ago saying it was too old to be a viable fighter.
Well then Camaron, i think the term should be EPIC FAIL. ::)

Still....... we still dont have a carrier to put them or anything on at the moment. :-[
« Last Edit: 27 June 2014, 18:23:32 by ffcgary1 »
Logged
Elite leather, cruise control, 3.0ltr cams, gas flowed 3.0ltr inlet manifold, 4 bar fuel pressure regulator, rear side window demisters, rear electric windows. projectors /HID'S, h/l washers.
Jaguar XJ6

Lizzie_Zoom

  • Guest
Re: When the undercarriage fails when landing a Harrier...
« Reply #3 on: 27 June 2014, 20:19:41 »

funny thing about this is, that stool is not a stool but a nose rig built to do the job, and how the most powerful air force in the world is still using a jet that the british designed and built, then scrapped 5 years ago saying it was too old to be a viable fighter.
Well then Camaron, i think the term should be EPIC FAIL. ::)

Still....... we still dont have a carrier to put them or anything on at the moment. :-[

We do; HMS Illustrious.  Chiefly now a helicopter carrier, but  I feel sure could be used to land a Harrier or two.  Fuelling and servicing could perhaps be a problem (???) but I am sure in an emergency it could be done.

Still we will have at least one, if not two, super carriers in the not too distant future, if that is now a militarily sensible option and they haven't become as vulnerable as the battleship.
Logged

kevinp58

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • kent
  • Posts: 1462
    • 2002 3.2 elite
    • View Profile
Re: When the undercarriage fails when landing a Harrier...
« Reply #4 on: 27 June 2014, 20:42:50 »

Glad to see the Americans are still using the amazing and very successful Harrier  :y :y it was a huge mistake that the British government decided to get rid of a plane that still has huge benefits in modern warfare.  ::)
Logged

tigers_gonads

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Kinston Upon Hull
  • Posts: 8610
  • Driving a Honda CR-V which doesn't smell of pee
    • Honda CR-V
    • View Profile
Re: When the undercarriage fails when landing a Harrier...
« Reply #5 on: 27 June 2014, 22:54:44 »

funny thing about this is, that stool is not a stool but a nose rig built to do the job, and how the most powerful air force in the world is still using a jet that the british designed and built, then scrapped 5 years ago saying it was too old to be a viable fighter.
Well then Camaron, i think the term should be EPIC FAIL. ::)

Still....... we still dont have a carrier to put them or anything on at the moment. :-[

We do; HMS Illustrious.  Chiefly now a helicopter carrier, but  I feel sure could be used to land a Harrier or two.  Fuelling and servicing could perhaps be a problem (???) but I am sure in an emergency it could be done.

Still we will have at least one, if not two, super carriers in the not too distant future, if that is now a militarily sensible option and they haven't become as vulnerable as the battleship.


Used in conjunction with the type 45 which is as good as you can get  ;)
Logged

tigers_gonads

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Kinston Upon Hull
  • Posts: 8610
  • Driving a Honda CR-V which doesn't smell of pee
    • Honda CR-V
    • View Profile
Re: When the undercarriage fails when landing a Harrier...
« Reply #6 on: 27 June 2014, 23:01:26 »

Glad to see the Americans are still using the amazing and very successful Harrier  :y :y it was a huge mistake that the British government decided to get rid of a plane that still has huge benefits in modern warfare.  ::)



We could only afford to keep either the Tornado Gr4's or the Harriers  :(
Tornado could carry the Stormshadow missile and Brimstone.
Typhoon wasn't cleared to carry either and we couldn't afford to push through the package that would let them.

The Harrier could only carry Brimstone so we sold the Harriers to the yanks as spares  >:(

Sadly, the MOD is (and has been since the wall came down) run by accountants  >:(
Logged

kevinp58

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • kent
  • Posts: 1462
    • 2002 3.2 elite
    • View Profile
Re: When the undercarriage fails when landing a Harrier...
« Reply #7 on: 28 June 2014, 19:39:33 »

Glad to see the Americans are still using the amazing and very successful Harrier  :y :y it was a huge mistake that the British government decided to get rid of a plane that still has huge benefits in modern warfare.  ::)



We could only afford to keep either the Tornado Gr4's or the Harriers  :(
Tornado could carry the Stormshadow missile and Brimstone.
Typhoon wasn't cleared to carry either and we couldn't afford to push through the package that would let them.

The Harrier could only carry Brimstone so we sold the Harriers to the yanks as spares  >:(

Sadly, the MOD is (and has been since the wall came down) run by accountants  >:(







 we could afford both if we didn't give all that money to the Eurocrats and the Eurozone  >:( >:(
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 17 queries.