Anybody who has worked in the US capitalist dog-eat-dog system like I have, will have been screwed, with their 200 page contracts, but with experience and most satisfaction, you screw them back, I came out ahead, this is their dog-eat-dog world. Personally, I prefer UK/European capitalism where industries know they are competing and do so in a friendly manner rather than the US aggressive adversarial/malicious way.
I wish Unilever and their employees the very best of luck. Like Cadbury employees were given guarantees, which they have not allegedly kept to, where much production has now moved from Birmingham to Poland. US capitalism has only one aim and that is their profit bottom line. Attack, screw and undermine your rivals, produce where it is the most cheapest, downgrade quality to the minimum or much below as your advertising and marketing will make up the difference. Pay your CEOs and VPs vast amounts, so they can screw everybody, cut costs, wages quality R&D to meet your targets, but if this is going to fail, then use a share buy back to hit your share price and earnings targets and your mega share and cash bonuses will be fulfilled, this is the current US public company capitalist way.
As a capitalist I'm not a fan of the dog-eat-dog US version.
The good news is that the wheels are finally falling off their wagon, through outsourcing especially with China, but they aim to counter this with their Border Tax. If you want to know more about this , how it will work, along with the repatriation of US profits by much lower CT, and how it will all potentially have grave effects on the global trade system and UK wealth, much like the dark ages and 1930 US depression, then if you are interested, I will start one of my economist threads and explain?