you forget i used to read the Guardian: how about just one year for example - almost any column from 2004 will do it seems-
The Diary column of The Guardian newspaper annually documents the results of a "Littlejohn audit" — a count of the number of references Littlejohn makes to homosexuality in his columns.
In the past year's Sun columns, Richard has referred 42 times to gays, 16 times to lesbians, 15 to homosexuals, eight to bisexuals, twice to 'homophobia' and six to being 'homophobic' (note his scornful inverted commas), five times to cottaging, four to 'gay sex in public toilets', three to poofs, twice to lesbianism, and once each to buggery, dykery, and poovery. This amounts to 104 references in 90-odd columns — an impressive increase on his 2003 total of 82 mentions. There is, alas, no space for us to revisit the scientific study which found obsessive homophobes more responsive to gay porn. But Richard, we're begging you: talk to someone.
—Marina Hyde, The Guardian
Littlejohn has claimed he is opposed to discrimination against homosexuals. In his Daily Mail column on 10 October 2007, he said, in reference to British society in the 1970s: "Though homosexuality wasn't exactly my idea of a night out, I thought it outrageous that gays were subjected to discrimination in areas such as employment, housing and pensions." However Johann Hari provided quotes from Littlejohn's writing at the time showing he had linked homosexuality to paedophilia and that he had joked about gay-bashing. Ben Summerskill in the Guardian, and Brian Paddick in Attitude reflecting on a dinner he had with Littlejohn, have suggested Littlejohn talks so much about the subject because he is a repressed homosexual.
references and links from wiki here :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Littlejohnas for being racist - referring to Barack Obama as uppity in my view is racist, why use that particular word "uppity" unless you're implying the n-word to follow, Littljohn's columns are designed to provoke reaction but also curry favour with the lowest common denominator sadly. i prefer a higher standard that's all Nick
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1045090/Obama-President-Dont-count-chickens.html