Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Bourne]

Have a look at this amazingly talented 3 yr old! Incredible .http://tumblr.com/xv517p8arv

[fudgee]

Now that's what I call clever camera work 

[PhilRich]

Now that's what I call clever camera work 

Yep it's a fake, his hand is actually 4 years old!

[Bourne]

Now that's what I call clever camera work 
Do you have a reason to make you say that or are you just a bit of a skeptic?

[skyblue]

very clever young lad 

[fudgee]

Yes Bourne.

It would be very simple to get a camera angle that shows the whole of the child and his picture at the same time.
Leave it on him and record the whole process from start to finish.

Instead of that, all you get is shots of his arm then a shot of his face, then it cuts back to his arm then back to his face and so on.
By doing that your leaving yourself open to people suggesting that the boy is not doing the entire piece.
If you wanted to record and show the whole world how talented your child was then why would you do that?

Also there is an ubundance of shots of him dipping his fingers into the paint which was pretty obviously done with your sub-consiouss mind in thought ( he's dipping his fingers in the paint so it must be him painting)

And finally their American, it's not that same family who did that hoax with the balloon/flying saucer thing is it 

[millwall]

very talented if if all above board  but im not so sure :-/

[Amigo]

Thier are child prodigies in this world & i'd love to believe it but he puts all his fingers in the paint bowl but only uses one to paint. The others would drip everywhere, sorry.
    Turtle power!!!!

[Bourne]

Yes Bourne.

It would be very simple to get a camera angle that shows the whole of the child and his picture at the same time.
Leave it on him and record the whole process from start to finish.

Instead of that, all you get is shots of his arm then a shot of his face, then it cuts back to his arm then back to his face and so on.
By doing that your leaving yourself open to people suggesting that the boy is not doing the entire piece.
If you wanted to record and show the whole world how talented your child was then why would you do that?

Also there is an ubundance of shots of him dipping his fingers into the paint which was pretty obviously done with your sub-consiouss mind in thought ( he's dipping his fingers in the paint so it must be him painting)

And finally their American, it's not that same family who did that hoax with the balloon/flying saucer thing is it 

I see your point .. but it hardly seems worth all that  effort. Most parents are proud of their kids regardless of whether they're talented or not. Naive ..? perhaps , but I'd like to think that there really are some genuine child prodigies out there.