Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 3 years old !  (Read 767 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bourne

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Essex
  • Posts: 174
  • Stupid tiny glovebox !
    • View Profile
3 years old !
« on: 08 January 2011, 21:38:39 »

Have a look at this amazingly talented 3 yr old! Incredible .http://tumblr.com/xv517p8arv
Logged

fudgee

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 379
    • View Profile
Re: 3 years old !
« Reply #1 on: 08 January 2011, 21:43:13 »

Now that's what I call clever camera work  ::) ::)
Logged

PhilRich

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • A bit further North of the Back of Beyond!
  • Posts: 10338
    • Mk 2 Volvo V70
    • View Profile
Re: 3 years old !
« Reply #2 on: 08 January 2011, 21:53:23 »

Quote
Now that's what I call clever camera work  ::) ::)







Yep it's a fake, his hand is actually 4 years old! ;) ;D
Logged
If it ain't broke keep fixing it 'til it is!

Bourne

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Essex
  • Posts: 174
  • Stupid tiny glovebox !
    • View Profile
Re: 3 years old !
« Reply #3 on: 08 January 2011, 21:58:14 »

Quote
Now that's what I call clever camera work  ::) ::)
Do you have a reason to make you say that or are you just a bit of a skeptic?
Logged

skyblue

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Bracknell
  • Posts: 1212
    • View Profile
Re: 3 years old !
« Reply #4 on: 08 January 2011, 22:03:42 »

very clever young lad  :y
Logged
Caravaners  can only go as fast as the rest of the  other road users... so deal with it

fudgee

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 379
    • View Profile
Re: 3 years old !
« Reply #5 on: 08 January 2011, 22:12:56 »

Yes Bourne.

It would be very simple to get a camera angle that shows the whole of the child and his picture at the same time.
Leave it on him and record the whole process from start to finish.

Instead of that, all you get is shots of his arm then a shot of his face, then it cuts back to his arm then back to his face and so on.
By doing that your leaving yourself open to people suggesting that the boy is not doing the entire piece.
If you wanted to record and show the whole world how talented your child was then why would you do that?

Also there is an ubundance of shots of him dipping his fingers into the paint which was pretty obviously done with your sub-consiouss mind in thought ( he's dipping his fingers in the paint so it must be him painting)

And finally their American, it's not that same family who did that hoax with the balloon/flying saucer thing is it  ;D ;D
« Last Edit: 08 January 2011, 22:13:54 by mrfudge01 »
Logged

millwall

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • se london
  • Posts: 3138
  • no muff too tuff
    • accord type s
    • View Profile
Re: 3 years old !
« Reply #6 on: 08 January 2011, 22:16:55 »

very talented if if all above board  but im not so sure :-/
Logged

Amigo

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Immingham N.E Lincs.
  • Posts: 4116
  • Be objective, be selective.
    • Passat & Cortina GXL
    • View Profile
Re: 3 years old !
« Reply #7 on: 08 January 2011, 22:32:51 »

Thier are child prodigies in this world & i'd love to believe it but he puts all his fingers in the paint bowl but only uses one to paint. The others would drip everywhere, sorry.
    Turtle power!!!! :D
Logged
Curry makes the world go round!

Bourne

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Essex
  • Posts: 174
  • Stupid tiny glovebox !
    • View Profile
Re: 3 years old !
« Reply #8 on: 08 January 2011, 23:00:10 »

Quote
Yes Bourne.

It would be very simple to get a camera angle that shows the whole of the child and his picture at the same time.
Leave it on him and record the whole process from start to finish.

Instead of that, all you get is shots of his arm then a shot of his face, then it cuts back to his arm then back to his face and so on.
By doing that your leaving yourself open to people suggesting that the boy is not doing the entire piece.
If you wanted to record and show the whole world how talented your child was then why would you do that?

Also there is an ubundance of shots of him dipping his fingers into the paint which was pretty obviously done with your sub-consiouss mind in thought ( he's dipping his fingers in the paint so it must be him painting)

And finally their American, it's not that same family who did that hoax with the balloon/flying saucer thing is it  ;D ;D

I see your point .. but it hardly seems worth all that  effort. Most parents are proud of their kids regardless of whether they're talented or not. Naive ..? perhaps , but I'd like to think that there really are some genuine child prodigies out there.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 17 queries.