Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Did my eyes deceive me?  (Read 2661 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Taxi_Driver

  • Guest
Re: Did my eyes deceive me?
« Reply #15 on: 28 June 2007, 22:47:23 »

Ohhhh manual   :(.....i'll give you £200 for it.....carnt say fairer than that.....dunnno why £200 popped into my mind  ;D ;)
« Last Edit: 28 June 2007, 22:48:03 by Taxi_Driver »
Logged

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37573
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: Did my eyes deceive me?
« Reply #16 on: 28 June 2007, 22:50:27 »

Quote
Dark grey cloth interior.

About £2.5K would be a starter, had 4 new tyres and new exhaust since xmas.

I am tempted myself... funds are not good at the moment for it though  >:(
Logged

JamesV6CDX

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gloucestershire/Buckinghamshire
  • Posts: 16640
    • Omega 3.2 Retail MV6 LPG
    • View Profile
Re: Did my eyes deceive me?
« Reply #17 on: 29 June 2007, 07:25:25 »

Quote
yep, there was never a 2.5 MV6, in pre-facelift or facelift form.

But as Markie says, 2001 came the 2.6 MV6.

One in manual form at the right price with less 100k miles, might be a replacement for my 2.2! - Should point out a manual 2.6 will be quicker than an auto 3.0/3.2  ;)

So where does my manual 3.0 come into this equation ;) ;D
Logged

STMO123

  • Guest
Re: Did my eyes deceive me?
« Reply #18 on: 29 June 2007, 07:38:11 »

Quote
Quote
yep, there was never a 2.5 MV6, in pre-facelift or facelift form.

But as Markie says, 2001 came the 2.6 MV6.

One in manual form at the right price with less 100k miles, might be a replacement for my 2.2! - Should point out a manual 2.6 will be quicker than an auto 3.0/3.2  ;)

So where does my manual 3.0 come into this equation ;) ;D

Quick, but very old ;D
Logged

Big Rod

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Fife, Scotland
  • Posts: 845
    • View Profile
Re: Did my eyes deceive me?
« Reply #19 on: 29 June 2007, 10:01:03 »

Quote
Should point out a manual 2.6 will be quicker than an auto 3.0/3.2  ;)

Absolute piffle!!!!

Wouldn't mind a shot of a 3.2 manual mind you!
Logged
If I have to explain you won't understand!

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37573
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: Did my eyes deceive me?
« Reply #20 on: 29 June 2007, 10:28:20 »

Quote
Quote
Should point out a manual 2.6 will be quicker than an auto 3.0/3.2  ;)

Absolute piffle!!!!

Wouldn't mind a shot of a 3.2 manual mind you!

2.5/2.6 is geared lower.... so in manual form just as quick as the 3's  ;)
Logged

Big Rod

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Fife, Scotland
  • Posts: 845
    • View Profile
Re: Did my eyes deceive me?
« Reply #21 on: 29 June 2007, 10:39:44 »

Quote
2.5/2.6 is geared lower.... so in manual form just as quick as the 3's  ;)

Well, having gone from my 3.2 Auto immediately to Bob Dent's old 2.5 Manual, I can tell you that it/they aren't.

Don't get me wrong, in comparison to SWMBO's 2.5 auto, it was quite lively, but wouldn't stand a chance against the 3.2.
Logged
If I have to explain you won't understand!

Markie

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Lanarkshire, Scotland
  • Posts: 7762
    • RS4, BMW X5, Range Rover
    • View Profile
    • http://www.facebook.com/pages/Markiescarparts/149306545168993
Re: Did my eyes deceive me?
« Reply #22 on: 29 June 2007, 12:34:06 »

Quote
Quote
2.5/2.6 is geared lower.... so in manual form just as quick as the 3's  ;)

Well, having gone from my 3.2 Auto immediately to Bob Dent's old 2.5 Manual, I can tell you that it/they aren't.

Don't get me wrong, in comparison to SWMBO's 2.5 auto, it was quite lively, but wouldn't stand a chance against the 3.2.


In fairness Bobs had a misfire at the time. Now its fixed i can see it giving the 3.0`s a fair run :-/
Logged
MarkiesCarParts-Online Now With A New 4000FT Partswarehouse; Stocking Thousands of Vauxhall,Peugeot, Citroen, Renault & Rover NEW Parts - Check us on Ebay MarkiesCarParts-Online. PM me via OOF for discount

Big Rod

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Fife, Scotland
  • Posts: 845
    • View Profile
Re: Did my eyes deceive me?
« Reply #23 on: 29 June 2007, 13:05:43 »

Quote
In fairness Bobs had a misfire at the time. Now its fixed i can see it giving the 3.0`s a fair run :-/

Appreciated, but it didn't have the misfire initially. Don't know about the 3.0's, but I'm still sticking to what I said about the 3.2 Auto.
Logged
If I have to explain you won't understand!

STMO123

  • Guest
Re: Did my eyes deceive me?
« Reply #24 on: 29 June 2007, 14:45:06 »

Manufacturers figures say 3.2 auto is quicker than 2.5 or 2.6 manual.

2.5i V6 24V CDX 4d  2498 / 6 167 142 8.2 27 15

2.6 V6 24V CDX 4d  2597 / 6 176 142 8.2 26 16

3.2 V6 24V Elite 4d Auto (LT)  3175 / 4 213 149 8.0 23 17
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107023
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: Did my eyes deceive me?
« Reply #25 on: 29 June 2007, 21:03:13 »

I get to drive a few when Tech2'ing, obviously I tend not to thrash other people's pride and joy, but my MV6 seems much quicker than any 2.5 manual...
Logged
Grumpy old man
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.011 seconds with 17 queries.