I think the 465 was probably about the best scope they made. I have a 2236 which works nicely but a sod to work on and clearly built to a price, which none of the earlier 'scopes seemed to. People say good things about the 2465 but I haven't played with one recently.
I have 3 7000 series at the moment. a 7904, 7603 and 7623. Would love to come across a spec ana plugin but they seem quite rare.
I agree that digital 'scopes don't "feel right" in comparison to analogue scopes. The slightest flicker of an analogue 'scope tells you something, which you'll probably miss with a digital scope. However, it's mainly down to user interface and a slightly different approach being required to use them, IMHO. A load of menus to wade through doesn't seem to be a match for a couple of switches on the front panel.
The better digital scopes do work very nicely and don't mislead because they use plenty fast sample rates, but if you're not working on stuff that needs to be ruthlessly fast and you don't need storage, you're still better off with an analogue scope IMHO. I think the mistake Tek made was dropping the analogue scopes from the bottom end of the range because their low end digital scopes are nasty.
Kevin