Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[geoff]

yes actually 8-) 8-) 8-)

[TheBoy]

The ZT 2.5 V6 isn't too bad a car tbh. Quick, little torque steer, decent top end, reasonable torque.  Downsides, traction from standing start, stupid cambelts (yes, it has 2) arrangement, and the usual K series (it has KV6) HG problem.

Oh, and for many, just because its a 'Rover' (actually its MG) - but these people are narrow minded in the same way junior reps will only consider BMW 318 crap.

[STMO123]

The ZT 2.5 V6 isn't too bad a car tbh. Quick, little torque steer, decent top end, reasonable torque.

Have you been drinking/taking drugs?  

[Crazydad]

You wont be so happy when the cambelts need doing . That's if one of the HGs doesn't go first  

Cambelts done  HG's will not go, as much as you'd love them to

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

It'll be fine Pete, it's a proper V6  

yeh but its front wheel drive poo really with its toque steer,long live rear wheel drive with it superior handling

Does your 2.0 handle really well at high speeds?  Oh..you wouldn't know, would you?

Ohhhhhhh that was nasty

[STMO123]

You wont be so happy when the cambelts need doing . That's if one of the HGs doesn't go first  

Cambelts done  HG's will not go, as much as you'd love them to

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

It'll be fine Pete, it's a proper V6  

yeh but its front wheel drive poo really with its toque steer,long live rear wheel drive with it superior handling

Does your 2.0 handle really well at high speeds?  Oh..you wouldn't know, would you?

Ohhhhhhh that was nasty

I know, I know

[Martin_1962]

2.0 were not that slow, bit slow off the line but will still go quite fast.

I have seen the predecessor model (a Carlton 2.0) red line in top gear, that is with less power