Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Oil consumption mystery + compression test?  (Read 2973 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JamesV6CDX

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gloucestershire/Buckinghamshire
  • Posts: 16640
    • Omega 3.2 Retail MV6 LPG
    • View Profile
Re: Oil consumption mystery + compression test?
« Reply #15 on: 29 August 2007, 15:00:35 »

Mmmm mineral oil, those were the days!

Will the mineral oil protect it well enough?
Logged

Paul M

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Edinburgh
  • Posts: 1528
    • View Profile
Re: Oil consumption mystery + compression test?
« Reply #16 on: 29 August 2007, 15:04:05 »

That was exactly my first thought when I read the thread, the oil is way too thin for such a high mileage engine. I was just wondering how many replies there would be before someone mentioned it :).

I wouldn't even use 0w40 in the Omega, and that shows no signs of burning any oil at all. Stick to 10w40 as recommended, or possibly even try 15w50 if that's within the specs (not sure if the hydraulic tappets will like it). I'm currently using Halfords ( :-[ ) fully synth 5w40, but only because I didn't have any VX stuff left when I decided to do the oil change, and the Halfords fully synth was on 2 for 1 offer so worked out cheaper than any of the semi-synth stuff.
Logged

PaulW

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Somewhere near Manchester
  • Posts: 1769
  • Come on you fiend!
    • Some crappy Insignia
    • View Profile
Re: Oil consumption mystery + compression test?
« Reply #17 on: 29 August 2007, 15:24:23 »

Definately needs some thicker oil.

Can't fault the vaux semi-synth 10w40 at all - used it all the time in the corsa.
Logged
Humbugs...

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: Oil consumption mystery + compression test?
« Reply #18 on: 29 August 2007, 16:37:49 »

Oil control ring wear and too thin oil.

I would suggest 15/40 possibly even 20/50

On an old car I found that free Vauxhall mineral would burn a lot quicker than Esso mineral. So when my free supply stopped I had to start oil changes again rather than run total loss.
Logged

JamesV6CDX

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gloucestershire/Buckinghamshire
  • Posts: 16640
    • Omega 3.2 Retail MV6 LPG
    • View Profile
Re: Oil consumption mystery + compression test?
« Reply #19 on: 29 August 2007, 16:39:27 »

Won't 20/50 be too thick for the hydraulic lifters, and strain the oil pump?
Logged

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: Oil consumption mystery + compression test?
« Reply #20 on: 29 August 2007, 16:41:54 »

Quote
Won't 20/50 be too thick for the hydraulic lifters, and strain the oil pump?

Try progressively thicker oils start at 10/40 then go up.

I can't see it straining, but possibly could play up the lifters - you can only try
Logged

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: Oil consumption mystery + compression test?
« Reply #21 on: 29 August 2007, 16:45:32 »

15/40 should do - used to use it in the Sunbeam
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36417
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Oil consumption mystery + compression test?
« Reply #22 on: 29 August 2007, 16:59:22 »

Thick oils can cause the lifters to pump up on some engines. Unless the topping up is a real pain I wouldn't necessarily worry too much.

At the risk of prolonging this "oil thread", however, I'm having some difficulty understanding why 0w40 is any worse than 10w40, 20w40, etc. Experience (including my own) says it is, but my understanding of the grading of oils is that the "40" indicates the viscosity is in a certain range at operating temperature (spec'ed at 100 deg. c IIRC). So a 0w40 should have a similar viscosity as a 20w40 at 100 degrees C and should be no more liable to slip through the seals and burn.

The "w" figure ("0", "10", "20"), as I understand it, indicates what viscosity it is equivalent to at lower temperatures, relative to a monograde oil.

In other words, the only difference between a 0w40 and a 20w40 is that, when cold, it pumps easier because it is equivalent to a thinner monograde oil. Oils with a lower winter rating are also usually more resistant to further thinning at higher temperatures (above 100 deg c).

James' engine probably spends most of its' time around 100 degrees C, making the winter rating insignificant, so can anyone explain what I'm missing?

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: Oil consumption mystery + compression test?
« Reply #23 on: 29 August 2007, 17:02:13 »

It takes quite a long time to get the engine up to temperature - I would guess easily 5 or 6 miles minimum.
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36417
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Oil consumption mystery + compression test?
« Reply #24 on: 29 August 2007, 17:10:22 »

Quote
It takes quite a long time to get the engine up to temperature - I would guess easily 5 or 6 miles minimum.

.. and longer than that to get the oil fully up to temperature, of course. Maybe it's during the warmup phase that most of the oil is lost  :-/

Theory and practice just don't seem to meet for me, and it bugs me when that happens.  >:(

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

Taxi_Driver

  • Guest
Re: Oil consumption mystery + compression test?
« Reply #25 on: 29 August 2007, 18:11:55 »

Personally i would bung vx semi back in it......it always had that in it when i owned it.

I remember telling you James and also mentioned it in a thread that it used 1ltr/2k miles.

Then see what the consumption is like......as a comparision.

Since you have rebuilt the head on it.....i would expect it to be better than 1ltr/2k.

Much worse than that.....then theres summat wrong.....it carnt suddenly start using more oil.
Logged

hotel21

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • The Kingdom of Fife
  • Posts: 13021
    • View Profile
Re: Oil consumption mystery + compression test?
« Reply #26 on: 29 August 2007, 18:48:29 »

My tuppence....   ;)

Its an engine with a telephone number mileage as well as goodness knows how many hours ticking over on 'standby' of a cold night with the heater on.  Its bound to use oil.   Check the Vectra handbook and see what the VX estimated oil consumption is, then double it or so......

Bigger potential prob is why the cylinder comp differences are larger than the recommended 10%.  No1 comp down or 3 & 4 increased due to oil presence from plug removal?

I accept what Mark says about pocketed pistons and that the oil will hide there rather than down the bores, but how about this...

Ensure plug holes are clean of old oil.  Remove all plugs, retake comps across all four - thats result 'A'.  Take compressions with throttle wide open (if cable) or inlet butterfly's removed if FBW.

Put a healthy measure of oil down all 4 bores and, with plugs removed and a suitable absorbent cloth strategically placed and held by your version of Debbie McGee, turn the engine over by hand/spanner then later jag it over on the starter (to avoid possible hydraulic lock) then take readings.   This is result 'B'.

Now read and compare comps.  If all 4 'A' readings are within 10% of each other, grand....  If one (or two) wildly out, potential problem with indicated cylider(s).

If the wet test comps ('B') are also within 10% but higher, then its simply a tired engine thats had a head job.  Oil does a temp job of increasing ring/bore seal long enough to get a set of comps.  If no appreciable drop in power output, use 15/50 or 20/50 to reduce costs in 'total loss' oil system.

If you still get 3 & 4 with increased comps in comparison to 1 & 2, then its looking like the head is at fault, despite overhaul.  If no difference in 'A' and 'B' then its the head, not the rings.

I know above wet/dry comp tests are like sucking eggs to you James but, to me, its worth a redo to ensure all is OK and its simply tired and has a wee thirst for oil.....     :y

« Last Edit: 29 August 2007, 18:49:54 by hotel21 »
Logged

familyman

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Sittingbourne, Kent
  • Posts: 314
    • View Profile
Re: Oil consumption mystery + compression test?
« Reply #27 on: 29 August 2007, 20:08:14 »

The reason your not seeing any burnt oil smoke out of the exhaust is due to the catalyst collecting it for you. As the oil vapour is different for normal exhaust gases it doesn't pass through the cat as well when its cold, as the cat warms up it slowley starts to burn off the residue oil by which time your engine/piston rings have warmed up and sealed better so any more oil vapour is able to be burnt of by the cat. :)
Logged
You came in that, your braver than i thought

smoothomega

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Perth, Western Australia
  • Posts: 1240
  • 2002 2.2DTI CDX,
    • View Profile
Re: Oil consumption mystery + compression test?
« Reply #28 on: 29 August 2007, 21:18:23 »

Sounds a bit like a thread i started some time ago before i knew better  ;D That was which 0#! is best  :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X
Lesson learnt  :y
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.014 seconds with 17 queries.