Topic: CDX,s (Read 2285 times)

kevinp58 · « **Reply #15 on:** 31 July 2013, 12:26:49 »

This looks don't look bad http://www.jpscars.co.uk/lot_details.asp?lotid=14316&l=1&i=&catid=&a=&loc=&pageno=1

tunnie · « **Reply #16 on:** 31 July 2013, 12:36:30 »

Quote from: henryd on 31 July 2013, 11:17:28

Quote from: tunnie on 30 July 2013, 20:05:07
Quote from: Mr.OmegaMan on 30 July 2013, 20:02:42
Quote from: ronnyd on 30 July 2013, 19:59:47
Quote from: Andy B on 30 July 2013, 19:42:42
Quote from: ronnyd on 30 July 2013, 19:41:06
They are both Desmonds.

you NEED more cylinders than doors!

Big is best, bigger is better still
How much more is a V6 to run costwise compared to a 2.2? $:-\$

I find the 3.2 very similar to the (2.2 petrol) on fuel, No idea about 2.2DTi though...

Have to disagree there, normal driving will see 27mpg average on 3.2, easily reach 34 average on the 2.2

Your 2.2 is a manual isn't it Tunnie?,that would make quite a difference

Yup mine is a manual

News:

Author Topic: CDX,s (Read 2285 times)

kevinp58

Re: CDX,s

tunnie

Re: CDX,s