Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: traders  (Read 816 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

cbs2

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • East Kilbride
  • Posts: 362
  • Right....Fire Up The Quattro!!!
    • View Profile
traders
« on: 18 May 2008, 15:51:40 »

with the number of trading disputes etc I have a suggestion.

On another forum I am a member of, all traders have a separate thread in a "feedback section"
Each thread is for an individual trader with a poll on it with "good" or "bad"
Every one that deals with the trader submits a poll answer & leaves comments
So anybody else can see the comments & a good/bad percentage & the traders have a link in their signatures.


Is this something we could do here??
Logged
Taking part in the 2010 sucata split charity banger run. www.sucatasplit.com
www.boozebrothers2010.co.uk
Ex-mig owner................For now

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107083
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: traders
« Reply #1 on: 18 May 2008, 20:59:56 »

Quote
with the number of trading disputes etc I have a suggestion.

On another forum I am a member of, all traders have a separate thread in a "feedback section"
Each thread is for an individual trader with a poll on it with "good" or "bad"
Every one that deals with the trader submits a poll answer & leaves comments
So anybody else can see the comments & a good/bad percentage & the traders have a link in their signatures.


Is this something we could do here??
We looked at such an idea, and actually tried it on our test setup.  There were a number of issues, one of those being a fundamental flaw in using the software in that manor....
Logged
Grumpy old man
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.014 seconds with 17 queries.