Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Rods2]

For or against?

This is in the context of the ISIS scum meeting an RAF Reaper as part of sending them to meet the real grim reaper. This is a very grey area in UK law and I personally think it needs to be clarified, so providing service personnel follow their rules of engagement they are immune from prosecution, which is where US service people stand.

IMO I can't see why we can't make belonging to ISIS or their affiliates illegal and subject to a formal rules of engagement policy. That way any citizen that joins them from the UK or any other country knows that they are subject to airborne based summary justice. If they ever return to or visit the UK they can then be tried for any illegal activities and war crimes, including treason if they have been associated with an organisation that has plotted or executed any attacks in the UK or anywhere else on our citizens. IMO legally, this is then little different to supporting the other side in times of a formally declared war.

I think doing this would remove much of the glamour that is associated and seems to attract radicalised UK citizens.

What do others think?

[Varche]

I agree with you.

I also think it is poor that as a country we question the Commander in Chief's decision to target them. Satanic State so called caliphate is at war with Britain , we are at war with them.

Better to kill them on foreign soil than have show trilas lasting decades back in the UK with the defendants debating , at taxpayers expense, their actual involvement.

War and its various guises has moved on from two countries squaring up to each other with infantry, trenches and a few tanks. We need to move rapidly to match the new war manifestations. 

[BazaJT]

Would agree with that.They have to be made to realise that joining such an "organisation"can and will result in swift and summary prosecution by whatever means are deemed appropriate.

[omegod]

They don't appear to follow any rules of engagement when slaughtering at will, go for them and neutralise them say's I

[STEMO]

This all very well, but it needed doing 10 or 15 years ago. Its far too late to have any impact now.

[BazaJT]

I can certainly sympathise with that point of view omegod,and to a certain extent I'd say we have to "get down and dirty"with them.What we do need to do though is take all possible steps so as not to cause slaughter among the innocents,and that is what sets us apart from them as they just don't care about anyone.

[the alarming man]

I can certainly sympathise with that point of view omegod,and to a certain extent I'd say we have to "get down and dirty"with them.What we do need to do though is take all possible steps so as not to cause slaughter among the innocents,and that is what sets us apart from them as they just don't care about anyone.

I can sort of see what baza is saying BUT these scum do not care about the innocents they take down on to the underground and blow to kingdom come...and I am not totally sure there are innocents around them

[Rods2]

To all OOF jihadists here is a clear and concise 'cutout and keep' guide on how to avoid being killed by a drone in Syria
































 

[tigers_gonads]

Give it to them straight ................. crawl back under the stone that they came from or we turn Mecca into a glass carpark   

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qT4mSoZsbzM