122mph in the wet, with a child on the back. How many of you would be supporting him not being locked up if he had come off and killed the child ?
We all no big sports bikes have virtually slick tyres anyway.
And at the end of the day crime is crime, if you can't do the time don't do the crime.
He took the chance of killing himself and a child. :-/
:-? That's news to me !
I believe he assumes as sports bikes tend too have a different tread pattern too other bikes he assumes there slicks.
Ah right.
That's the problem, folk don't realise that the technology behind bike tyres is streets ahead of car tyres.
The rear tyre for the average sports bike costs well over £100 and will last around 3k miles.
The average litre sports bike will accelerate from 0mph to 100mph and back to 0mph in less time than the average car can reach 60mph.
Not saying he wasn't irresponsible seeing as a passenger (not just a minor, any passenger) was on board, but what about the Young 'n' Dumb hot hatch brigade, hammering around our streets...with their mates on board. Several lives involved.
Custodial sentences there ? I doubt it somehow.