For once i'm going to attempt to be the voice of reason! No really i am! Ok, joking aside i understand the argument between KW & Entwood. KW is diving straight in, sleeves up , gloves off & want's to break the intruder up bigstyle. I understand this. I'd like to hang the so & so from the workshop roof by his wrists &...let's say make him feel very uncomfortable for some time. I'm sick enough to do this but in real terms i'd never get away with it so it's nothing but a nice thought. Entwood as is his vein has a more calming & thought out practical approach to such situations.
There are several arguments to each side of the coin. Legally speaking you mus'nt take the law into your own hands & in this case the intruder was retreating so no longer a threat. He was chased, attacked & badly beaten. The other side of the legal coin is beginning to recognise that sometimes the law is "a" ass & held back by the CPS, numerous do gooders etc. & folk have a constitutional right to protect their loved ones, properties & contents they have worked hard for. Being left a crime no. isn't much help. In my mind if anyone enters your property uninvited & with ill intent then they do so at their own risk if no workable laws are in place to protect us we have to protect ourselves.
In a nutshell, when you get shot of the laws, opinions, do gooders & all the rest of the old flannel you are left with one FACT...
AS with the Tony Martin case & this one....
If the miscreants hadn't have been there in the first place none of this would've happened. Simple as.