As far as going too fast is concerned, I feel I should point out that the sceptics are, by and large, sensible folks who are concerned that the science is being, or has been, distorted to make a political point. They, (well, certainly the ones I know) want the debate to move onto things like protecting the rain forests, protecting habitats, reducing disease etc. When the CO2 scam is finally revealed, I have no doubt that the David Bellamy's of this world will be re-instated and we can look after our planet in a sensible, compassionate and targeted way. We've just got to get rid of this daft guilt-driven policy which is actually harming the environment (e.g. the amount of forest being cleared for biofuels, etc.).
Wouldn't disagree about the sceptics. It's the media that bother me.
This seems to have all the characteristics of the launch of a bandwagon going in the opposite direction.
On past performance, no lessons will have been learned and the journalistic understanding of science will not have improved. Of course, to get going properly, it will require some politicians to step up to the mark to say "I never believed in GW/CC and it was all a load of media-driven nonsense". Don't think they'll have too much trouble finding them, though.
U-turn, anybody?