Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[cem_devecioglu]

  probably you didnt visit my second link..

Oswald was the choosen victim, who was a spy for US in Russia..Was well within the group .. But not the shooter.. The number of shots was done by 3 teams..  And some may choose to believe the single bullet 'dangle berries' theory which danced between people

please read

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/sibert.htm

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/interview.htm

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/confessionb.htm

[Lizzie_Zoom]

probably you didnt visit my second link..

Oswald was the choosen victim, who was a spy for US in Russia..Was well within the group .. But not the shooter.. The number of shots was done by 3 teams..  And some may choose to believe the single bullet 'dangle berries' theory which danced between people

please read

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/sibert.htm

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/interview.htm

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/confessionb.htm

Yes I did Cem

But there is so much material on this subject, as your links further add to.  There are many unanswered questions, but until the whole subject of the JFK assassination is properly debated in a formal creditable setting, ideally with academic, legal, and official record input then it is not wise to take anything on face value.  It all needs the aforementioned debate with the known (provable) facts, otherwise it will all stay a one big, or very many smaller, conspiracy theories. 

1963 is now some time ago and it is possible that once all the characters involved in this have departed, with the hinden  factors known by various USA department and "agencies" becoming far less sensitive and open to proper scrutiny, we will see a gradual release of "new facts".  However, it may take until 2063 before the brakes are fully off! Then it will become very interesting for historians, and especially those that publish books

[mantahatch]

Thank you for such an interesting link Cem. I did read it from start to finish.
I dislike america/americans anyway so it really appealed to me.

And yes I do enjoy conspiricies.


 

[cem_devecioglu]

probably you didnt visit my second link..

Oswald was the choosen victim, who was a spy for US in Russia..Was well within the group .. But not the shooter.. The number of shots was done by 3 teams..  And some may choose to believe the single bullet 'dangle berries' theory which danced between people

please read

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/sibert.htm

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/interview.htm

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/confessionb.htm

Yes I did Cem

But there is so much material on this subject, as your links further add to.  There are many unanswered questions, but until the whole subject of the JFK assassination is properly debated in a formal creditable setting, ideally with academic, legal, and official record input then it is not wise to take anything on face value.  It all needs the aforementioned debate with the known (provable) facts, otherwise it will all stay a one big, or very many smaller, conspiracy theories. 

1963 is now some time ago and it is possible that once all the characters involved in this have departed, with the hinden  factors known by various USA department and "agencies" becoming far less sensitive and open to proper scrutiny, we will see a gradual release of "new facts".  However, it may take until 2063 before the brakes are fully off! Then it will become very interesting for historians, and especially those that publish books

Lizzie in my opinion, everything including relations are very visible as its discussed throughly on the net..  Even if you watched the film JFK there were many details.. But if you want to wait new official !!! explanations (if you believe that can be done) , I'll admire your patience

[cem_devecioglu]

Thank you for such an interesting link Cem. I did read it from start to finish.
I dislike america/americans anyway so it really appealed to me.

And yes I do enjoy conspiricies.


 

Glad you liked it

[cem_devecioglu]

probably you didnt visit my second link..

Oswald was the choosen victim, who was a spy for US in Russia..Was well within the group .. But not the shooter.. The number of shots was done by 3 teams..  And some may choose to believe the single bullet 'dangle berries' theory which danced between people

please read

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/sibert.htm

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/interview.htm

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/confessionb.htm

Yes I did Cem

But there is so much material on this subject, as your links further add to.  There are many unanswered questions, but until the whole subject of the JFK assassination is properly debated in a formal creditable setting, ideally with academic, legal, and official record input then it is not wise to take anything on face value.  It all needs the aforementioned debate with the known (provable) facts, otherwise it will all stay a one big, or very many smaller, conspiracy theories. 

1963 is now some time ago and it is possible that once all the characters involved in this have departed, with the hinden  factors known by various USA department and "agencies" becoming far less sensitive and open to proper scrutiny, we will see a gradual release of "new facts".  However, it may take until 2063 before the brakes are fully off! Then it will become very interesting for historians, and especially those that publish books

Lizzie in my opinion, everything including relations are very visible as its discussed throughly on the net..  Even if you watched the film JFK there were many details.. But if you want to wait new official !!! explanations (if you believe that can be done) , I'll admire your patience

and one more point, discreditation is a general technique used in those events to cover up .. so I'm really desperate that you can find any info which will not be accused with some kind of disinformation

[Lizzie_Zoom]

probably you didnt visit my second link..

Oswald was the choosen victim, who was a spy for US in Russia..Was well within the group .. But not the shooter.. The number of shots was done by 3 teams..  And some may choose to believe the single bullet 'dangle berries' theory which danced between people

please read

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/sibert.htm

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/interview.htm

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/confessionb.htm

Yes I did Cem

But there is so much material on this subject, as your links further add to.  There are many unanswered questions, but until the whole subject of the JFK assassination is properly debated in a formal creditable setting, ideally with academic, legal, and official record input then it is not wise to take anything on face value.  It all needs the aforementioned debate with the known (provable) facts, otherwise it will all stay a one big, or very many smaller, conspiracy theories. 

1963 is now some time ago and it is possible that once all the characters involved in this have departed, with the hinden  factors known by various USA department and "agencies" becoming far less sensitive and open to proper scrutiny, we will see a gradual release of "new facts".  However, it may take until 2063 before the brakes are fully off! Then it will become very interesting for historians, and especially those that publish books

Lizzie in my opinion, everything including relations are very visible as its discussed throughly on the net..  Even if you watched the film JFK there were many details.. But if you want to wait new official !!! explanations (if you believe that can be done) , I'll admire your patience

I think we must face the facts that this will be a long wait!  I do not like it and wish there was another way, but the official American records will no doubt hold many truths, but like the British system on even "standard" information we have to wait for official disclosure.

As I hinted before, many knowledgeable historians will be waiting with baited breath!   

Information on the Vietnam War is gradually surfacing, and has featured in much discussion.  i.e. NSAM 263; released and led to a frenzy by certain historians on whether JKF intended to pull the US out of the conflict in late 1963. early 1964, but the circumstances of 22nd November 1963 meant this is open for great debate. 

The assisination is much more sensitive as no doubt it will cast shadows on existing "agencies"!

[cem_devecioglu]

probably you didnt visit my second link..

Oswald was the choosen victim, who was a spy for US in Russia..Was well within the group .. But not the shooter.. The number of shots was done by 3 teams..  And some may choose to believe the single bullet 'dangle berries' theory which danced between people

please read

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/sibert.htm

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/interview.htm

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/confessionb.htm

Yes I did Cem

But there is so much material on this subject, as your links further add to.  There are many unanswered questions, but until the whole subject of the JFK assassination is properly debated in a formal creditable setting, ideally with academic, legal, and official record input then it is not wise to take anything on face value.  It all needs the aforementioned debate with the known (provable) facts, otherwise it will all stay a one big, or very many smaller, conspiracy theories. 

1963 is now some time ago and it is possible that once all the characters involved in this have departed, with the hinden  factors known by various USA department and "agencies" becoming far less sensitive and open to proper scrutiny, we will see a gradual release of "new facts".  However, it may take until 2063 before the brakes are fully off! Then it will become very interesting for historians, and especially those that publish books

Lizzie in my opinion, everything including relations are very visible as its discussed throughly on the net..  Even if you watched the film JFK there were many details.. But if you want to wait new official !!! explanations (if you believe that can be done) , I'll admire your patience

I think we must face the facts that this will be a long wait!  I do not like it and wish there was another way, but the official American records will no doubt hold many truths, but like the British system on even "standard" information we have to wait for official disclosure.

As I hinted before, many knowledgeable historians will be waiting with baited breath!   

Information on the Vietnam War is gradually surfacing, and has featured in much discussion.  i.e. NSAM 263; released and led to a frenzy by certain historians on whether JKF intended to pull the US out of the conflict in late 1963. early 1964, but the circumstances of 22nd November 1963 meant this is open for great debate. 

The assisination is much more sensitive as no doubt it will cast shadows on existing "agencies"!

yep.. we will continue to watch famous Mickey Mouse

[Lizzie_Zoom]

probably you didnt visit my second link..

Oswald was the choosen victim, who was a spy for US in Russia..Was well within the group .. But not the shooter.. The number of shots was done by 3 teams..  And some may choose to believe the single bullet 'dangle berries' theory which danced between people

please read

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/sibert.htm

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/interview.htm

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/confessionb.htm

Yes I did Cem

But there is so much material on this subject, as your links further add to.  There are many unanswered questions, but until the whole subject of the JFK assassination is properly debated in a formal creditable setting, ideally with academic, legal, and official record input then it is not wise to take anything on face value.  It all needs the aforementioned debate with the known (provable) facts, otherwise it will all stay a one big, or very many smaller, conspiracy theories. 

1963 is now some time ago and it is possible that once all the characters involved in this have departed, with the hinden  factors known by various USA department and "agencies" becoming far less sensitive and open to proper scrutiny, we will see a gradual release of "new facts".  However, it may take until 2063 before the brakes are fully off! Then it will become very interesting for historians, and especially those that publish books

Lizzie in my opinion, everything including relations are very visible as its discussed throughly on the net..  Even if you watched the film JFK there were many details.. But if you want to wait new official !!! explanations (if you believe that can be done) , I'll admire your patience

I think we must face the facts that this will be a long wait!  I do not like it and wish there was another way, but the official American records will no doubt hold many truths, but like the British system on even "standard" information we have to wait for official disclosure.

As I hinted before, many knowledgeable historians will be waiting with baited breath!   

Information on the Vietnam War is gradually surfacing, and has featured in much discussion.  i.e. NSAM 263; released and led to a frenzy by certain historians on whether JKF intended to pull the US out of the conflict in late 1963. early 1964, but the circumstances of 22nd November 1963 meant this is open for great debate. 

The assisination is much more sensitive as no doubt it will cast shadows on existing "agencies"!

yep.. we will continue to watch famous Mickey Mouse

Do you think the CIA have him in their employment?

[cem_devecioglu]

probably you didnt visit my second link..

Oswald was the choosen victim, who was a spy for US in Russia..Was well within the group .. But not the shooter.. The number of shots was done by 3 teams..  And some may choose to believe the single bullet 'dangle berries' theory which danced between people

please read

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/sibert.htm

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/interview.htm

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/confessionb.htm

Yes I did Cem

But there is so much material on this subject, as your links further add to.  There are many unanswered questions, but until the whole subject of the JFK assassination is properly debated in a formal creditable setting, ideally with academic, legal, and official record input then it is not wise to take anything on face value.  It all needs the aforementioned debate with the known (provable) facts, otherwise it will all stay a one big, or very many smaller, conspiracy theories. 

1963 is now some time ago and it is possible that once all the characters involved in this have departed, with the hinden  factors known by various USA department and "agencies" becoming far less sensitive and open to proper scrutiny, we will see a gradual release of "new facts".  However, it may take until 2063 before the brakes are fully off! Then it will become very interesting for historians, and especially those that publish books

Lizzie in my opinion, everything including relations are very visible as its discussed throughly on the net..  Even if you watched the film JFK there were many details.. But if you want to wait new official !!! explanations (if you believe that can be done) , I'll admire your patience

I think we must face the facts that this will be a long wait!  I do not like it and wish there was another way, but the official American records will no doubt hold many truths, but like the British system on even "standard" information we have to wait for official disclosure.

As I hinted before, many knowledgeable historians will be waiting with baited breath!   

Information on the Vietnam War is gradually surfacing, and has featured in much discussion.  i.e. NSAM 263; released and led to a frenzy by certain historians on whether JKF intended to pull the US out of the conflict in late 1963. early 1964, but the circumstances of 22nd November 1963 meant this is open for great debate. 

The assisination is much more sensitive as no doubt it will cast shadows on existing "agencies"!

yep.. we will continue to watch famous Mickey Mouse

Do you think the CIA have him in their employment?

when it was first made , it was a "special" period in all aspects..  so I can easily  say , did its job