Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[PhilRich]

Sadly, you're all going about about injuctions being used to protect the sordid details of celebrities' private lives. Of MUCH more concern is the way injunctions are being used to silence free speech and the airing of real grievances.

Read this:

"Last week a heavily pregnant woman, whose name is known to millions but whom I am forbidden by law to identify, was summoned to the High Court at very short notice to show why she should not be imprisoned. The charges against her, brought by a local authority I cannot name, were that she might or might not have been in breach of a court order restraining her freedom to speak about a matter which, again, I am prohibited from identifying. "

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8455841/A-mother-is-threatened-with-imprisonment-for-talking-to-her-MP.html

 

That is absolutely OUTRAGEOUS!!!!

[Banjax]

r### ##g#    so i guess we cant play hang man due to the injunction  what is this country coming to

thats who i heard it was too 

[Martin_1962]

r### ##g#    so i guess we cant play hang man due to the injunction  what is this country coming to

thats who i heard it was too 

And the one with the prositute was a right Triumph

[Banjax]

r### ##g#    so i guess we cant play hang man due to the injunction  what is this country coming to

thats who i heard it was too 

And the one with the prositute was a right Triumph

Graham Norton? 
I hear the click of lawyers pens 



to be honest, the guy you're talking about - I'd never heard of him before all this - hope he didnt waste too much money