Would you like some facts ........
Over the last few days SWMBO and I have both been on quite long trips. I went to Hereford and did 350 miles in the Omega. She went to Kent and did 530 miles in her 2.0 Diesel Focus. Both cars were driven sensibly.
Omega 3.0 V6 auto trip average was 31.7 mpg
Focus 2.0 Tdci Manual trip average was 56 mpg
There you go .....
Now go and drive them both hard. I bet that wipes a good 8 mpg off the figures...
Derv; 56-8=48.
Mig; 31.7-8= not even 24mpg!
Derv WINS!!
Deisel loves work! Petrols love juice!!
Lol
Focus versus Omega is hardly comparing like with like.
![Wink ;)](http://images.omegaowners.com/forum/smf2000/Smileys/oofstd/wink.gif)
.. and a 31.7MPG V6 journey sounds like a motorway cruise. Now, I've had 24MPG on a motorway cruise. It was on an autobahn with the cruise control set to 120 MPH for a significant percentage of the time. Not something the Focus would
take kindly to survive.
![Wink ;)](http://images.omegaowners.com/forum/smf2000/Smileys/oofstd/wink.gif)
Granted, a V6 Omega can only dream of 35MPG let alone 50, but for real world motorway cruising (over the limit but not into 3 figures) the Omega doesn't really get that much more thirsty. Most diesels I've driven tend to be quite a bit more thirsty at vaguely naughty speeds encountered in the real world, meaning that the stunning 50something per gallon figures are achieved in the lorry lane. Not somewhere I want to be.
![Wink ;)](http://images.omegaowners.com/forum/smf2000/Smileys/oofstd/wink.gif)
Besides, I'm not arguing that petrol is cheaper.. Just that it's worth the money.
![Wink ;)](http://images.omegaowners.com/forum/smf2000/Smileys/oofstd/wink.gif)