Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Inlets, v6, short vs long...  (Read 2665 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: Inlets, v6, short vs long...
« Reply #15 on: 06 April 2013, 23:30:21 »

best intake I have ever seen is M3 intake design.. every cylinder have its own flap connected by a straight short tube..
 
 
it can be done on the omega but you need a serious change on omega hood..

Individual throttle bodies ;) Jenvey do them for the v6, but they are billions of £. I was looking into making speed triple bodies work...

never seen them.. but you can be sure they will be the second best mod that will bring high hp gains after forced induction..
 
I have read lots of pages about mods and as a summary on a na engine throttle(s) (door of engine)  are #1 factor that determines the volume  engine can suck..because there is a velocity limit that air can flow on a na engine..   and secondary limitor is valve area/lift..

Don't read, just do? ITB's are proven to work, but are expensive, hence the M3 using them and all racing cars :D

 ;D
Logged

GmasterT

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Cambridge
  • Posts: 388
  • does that drifting thing...
    • View Profile
Re: Inlets, v6, short vs long...
« Reply #16 on: 07 April 2013, 12:16:43 »

Ok, bit generic...  ;D
Logged

2woody

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Northumberland
  • Posts: 2374
    • View Profile
Re: Inlets, v6, short vs long...
« Reply #17 on: 07 April 2013, 23:35:11 »

if you want mid-range tractability, you'll need to be keeping the multi-ram system.

the short ram-pipes of the plenum-only are only superior above 4500 revs or so.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.291 seconds with 21 queries.