Not at all matey.
All the information is usefull.
Basically the allowances have allready been made.
My suggestion was to take a piece of cardboard based on the size of the chair, then add allowances for hand control and clearance etc, hence coming up with the size given.
At this point it becomes obvious that door frames are not big enough.
The options then go from bigger doors, to sliding doors and on to double doors.
Then something gets added, ths has to be considered etc etc.
It then ends up the person with the pending problems gets left out of the conversation and basically gets talked about. ending up with nothing to say about what they actually want.
The card board template was my idea of a make shift way of visulising what actual problems may occur.
An excellent idea for the basic concept, as the ability to move the basic chair can be assessed, however, IMHO, there are several other points to consider, which the cardboard template may miss....
Position of handles, switches, locks etc... the occupant of the chair needs to be able to reach and operate these.
Shelves, window ledges, radiators etc can all cause problems that don't immediately seem obvious
The effect of gravity on the doors ... don't laugh .. the council fitted an extra wide door to a friends house but as soon as she pushes it open it swings shut on her due to how it's been hung, so she ended up trying to power the wheels with one hand and hold the door with the other !! We have had to position a piece of cord and some pulleys to enable her to hold it open while she "transits" the space ... hopefully it will be rehung soon .. BTW I was categorically told NOT to rehang it for her

Having seen the way her wishes are ignored by idiots who THINK they know better, I really wish some of them could be strapped in a chair for 3 months ... perhaps they would learn to listen ... the user of the chair knows far better what is required than all of us .. usually !!