Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: 1 2 [3]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: The 2.2 omega  (Read 4337 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 106977
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: The 2.2 omega
« Reply #30 on: 06 July 2014, 10:27:48 »

0-60 times aren't really the story (and generally rubbish as well), its the way the power is delivered.

For example, the lower gearing on the 2.5 make 2.5 and 3.0 not dramatically different 0-60 time, but drive both, and its clear the bigger engine is far more effortless to accelerate, and cruise better at higher speeds. Also, it will pull from 50-70 far better than the smaller engine.

The Omega is a big, heavy car to be pulled by a 2.2 petrol. It cruises OK, but getting it to cruise speed (esp in Auto format) needs a bit of effort. The upside is slightly better economy, and more space to work on the engine, hopefully (from an OOF point of view) giving more confidence to the owner to try more DIY work on it, and dramatically reducing servicing/repair costs.
Does rather assume that you haven't nodded off on the way to cruising speed ;D
Slower cars have advantages, it teaches you to get the best out of it.

A VW Toerag fancied his chances after I overtook him on the brakes into a corner, which miffed him off (he shouldn't have been going so friggin slow then), and whilst he was all over me on the straights, he was left for dust in the bends.

That, m'lord, is the reason the Zaffy's range is bum squeakingly tight.
Logged
Grumpy old man

omegod

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • liverpool
  • Posts: 4348
    • 2017 Seat Ateca
    • View Profile
Re: The 2.2 omega
« Reply #31 on: 06 July 2014, 12:24:03 »

Had a 2.0, 2.2,2.6 and a 3.0 I must say the 3.0 was the daddy and espescially on LPG. 2.2 was " adequate" but very thirsty on the juice for the measly power and I dare say worse that the 2.6.
Logged
Happy to do Omega servicing etc around Merseyside,cruise activation, airbag lights sorted too...

Steve B

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Leicestershire
  • Posts: 3639
    • '52' MV6 3.2 Saloon
    • View Profile
Re: The 2.2 omega
« Reply #32 on: 06 July 2014, 13:32:13 »

Had a 2.0, 2.2,2.6 and a 3.0 I must say the 3.0 was the daddy and espescially on LPG. 2.2 was " adequate" but very thirsty on the juice for the measly power and I dare say worse that the 2.6.
Its the small engine pulling the big car around town . There ok on a motorway run.
Logged

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: The 2.2 omega
« Reply #33 on: 06 July 2014, 14:13:30 »

Not a new phenomenon though... My Granada Cosworth was about 5mpg more economical that the 2.0 auto it replaced...
Logged

Steve B

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Leicestershire
  • Posts: 3639
    • '52' MV6 3.2 Saloon
    • View Profile
Re: The 2.2 omega
« Reply #34 on: 13 July 2014, 16:57:56 »

Logged

plym ian

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Plymouth, Devon
  • Posts: 2997
    • 2.0 insignia elite tourer
    • View Profile
Re: The 2.2 omega
« Reply #35 on: 13 July 2014, 18:39:53 »

Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.012 seconds with 17 queries.