Oooh, well I wrote a reply, but 14(!) replies had been written in the time it took me to write mine. It appears much of what I was going to say has already been said... it went like
All fair enough - what I'm really saying is there are plenty of elements of car design which generations saw disappear, which each previous generation saw/lamented its passing, just thinking off the top of my head...
Hand-cranking (stupid electric motor adding weight, etc.. just maintain your car properly and it's go after the first crank or two)
Manual choke (the lost 'art' of where to have it and when, why do we need these swanky 'automatic' chokes)
Chassis, over monocoque construction (end of bespoke coachbuilding)
Proper Chrome bumpers (designed to protect the car, not deform at the slightest knock, and cost hundreds to replace/repair, as opposed to 15 mins with Autosol)
Power steering (more weight - exactly why do you need PAS on a Corsa? Skinny tyres + large steering wheel = worked for donkeys years)
and most recently...
Petrol (in 2010 Diesel overtook Petrol sales for the first time. Oh woe! Diesel isn't a 'proper' fuel etc.. Diseasel etc.. )
I'm not saying this is a list that can't be counter-argued, I'm sure it will, just that
Personally I'm amazed the manual gearbox still exists in this century in all but the most driver-focused cars like Caterhams etc.. I'd imagine it's purely down to extra costs of manufacture and fractional lower mpg..
why ? drivers who are capable of shifting still prefer manual.. 2-3 litre 95 ron fuel difference per 100 km makes a lot of cost for the life time of car..
Yes, totally, however, as I said, cars weighing many hundreds of kilos more now that they did 20 yrs ago also ads to fuel consumption, but this hasn't deterred manufacturers/buyers. Just imagine what the mpg - and speed - would be on a Mk 1 Astra, with a modern 1.4 engine, with all the emissions PC junk taken off. Just imagine what carrying 400 kgs of weight around with you all the time would do to your mpg.
.....
Personally I'm amazed the manual gearbox still exists in this century in all but the most driver-focused cars like Caterhams etc.. I'd imagine it's purely down to extra costs of manufacture and fractional lower mpg.......
On the later bmw diesels the mpg of the auto is better around town than the manual and marginally quicker 0-60mph.
Not much in it combined.
Again - there we go, autos are not 'automatically' (no pun intended) less fuel efficient. Not having a pop at all you manual drivers, of course, it's just for me, a car that does the gearchanging for you is as convenient as a car that tells me when the brake pads are worn badly, or adjusts the rear drums itself, and has electrically powered windows, heated seats etc...
I'd add that, as mentioned by previous poster, the eleccy handbrake is another feature that some say is better, others lament the passing of a 'proper' handbrake. Eee technology, in't it marvellous!