Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Fuel consumption  (Read 3269 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BazaJT

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • SLady bitshorpe N.Lincs.
  • Posts: 9116
    • Omega 3 litre Elite
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel consumption
« Reply #15 on: 03 December 2015, 18:33:55 »

Oh no!!!! Don't get Webby started on 0-60 times :D :D :D ;D
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 105989
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel consumption
« Reply #16 on: 03 December 2015, 18:48:59 »

I could post up over 5 yrs of data from my 3.0 auto, admittedly on LPG (so you'd need to add approx. 15%)
Logged
Grumpy old man

zirk

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Epping Forest
  • Posts: 11431
  • 3.2 Manual Special Saloon ReMapped and LPG'd and
    • 3.2 Manual Special Estate
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel consumption
« Reply #17 on: 03 December 2015, 20:13:26 »

OP - have a similar issue myself (though no 3.0 to compare it with, unlike yourself!  :))

Out of interest zirk, what will changing the MAF prove? Thought the MAFs weren't ever an issue on 2.5s always seeming bulletproof, only the later V6s for some reason seem to fail?

Check out my 'Stats' thread OP for some more info, if it helps  :)
It would prove its not a MAF problem, OP has almost like for like sitting on the drive so fairly easy to swop them over and see if the issue moves.

The MAF's don't always just fail, they can deteriorate over a time, feeding wrong info to the ECU.

 
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 105989
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel consumption
« Reply #18 on: 03 December 2015, 20:19:25 »

Generally, 2.5/3.0 MAFs either work, or are catastrophically wrong.  But there can always be exceptions, so if a spare exists on a convenient donor :y.


2.6/3.2 MAFs by comparison do tend to deteriorate rather than fail catastrophically.
Logged
Grumpy old man

terry paget

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Midsomer Norton Somerset
  • Posts: 4633
    • 3 Astras 2 Vectra
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel consumption
« Reply #19 on: 04 December 2015, 07:55:22 »

My two 2.5CDX manual saloons give about 29.5mpg over 2000 miles of mixed driving, my 2.2 manual saloon only gave 27.0mpg over a similar mileage. As discussed on different thread, earlier engines are more efficient.
Logged

terry paget

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Midsomer Norton Somerset
  • Posts: 4633
    • 3 Astras 2 Vectra
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel consumption
« Reply #20 on: 04 December 2015, 08:06:47 »

My two 2.5CDX manual saloons give about 29.5mpg over 2000 miles of mixed driving, my 2.2 manual saloon only gave 27.0mpg over a similar mileage. As discussed on different thread, earlier engines are more efficient.
Corection: the 2.5s are estates.
Logged

Diamond Black Geezer

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • N E Lincolnshire & Warwickshire
  • Posts: 5694
  • Diamond Black '96 CDX V6 - 'Pissy'
    • & a silly coupe coming...
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel consumption
« Reply #21 on: 04 December 2015, 09:03:15 »

OP - have a similar issue myself (though no 3.0 to compare it with, unlike yourself!  :))

Out of interest zirk, what will changing the MAF prove? Thought the MAFs weren't ever an issue on 2.5s always seeming bulletproof, only the later V6s for some reason seem to fail?

Check out my 'Stats' thread OP for some more info, if it helps  :)
It would prove its not a MAF problem, OP has almost like for like sitting on the drive so fairly easy to swop them over and see if the issue moves.

The MAF's don't always just fail, they can deteriorate over a time, feeding wrong info to the ECU.

oh if its sitting there, well worth the 5 minute swap it is, agreed.  :y

Just checking if there'd be much point before I started to go hunting around for a spare MAF, that's all :). Worth it if you've already got a spare, though, quite agree.

Logged
Ex-Dealer Kent-Moore Rear Wheel Bearing Tool available for hire, PM for details.

"There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes." 4th Doctor

zirk

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Epping Forest
  • Posts: 11431
  • 3.2 Manual Special Saloon ReMapped and LPG'd and
    • 3.2 Manual Special Estate
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel consumption
« Reply #22 on: 04 December 2015, 09:54:38 »

Strangely enough, Ive had 2 Maf's go, both on 3.0 MV6's, one gave up the ghost overnight and other was causing issues until I swapped it out.  I yet to have Maf go on a 2.6/3.2.:-\

Having said, Ive yet to have a Crank Sensor or Oil Cooler go on 3.0, they've all been on 2.6/3.2.   :-\ :-\
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 17 queries.