That is where I have to disagree. If you were to restrict the roads a car could use because of their vulnerability towards HGVs I think there would be a significant reaction. Lets say A roads and motorways should be for HGVs and car remain on B roads because they are smaller, more vulnerable and they find the narrow lanes easier to negotiate? Sensible?
Thing is, we already do restrict the types of roads different vehicles can use .. unless bicycles and mopeds (or is it scooters? I can never remember the distinction) are now allowed on motorways?
If we need to give cyclists at least 1.5 metres space (I always do), should they also have to give us a similar amount of space ?
I had 3 encounters yesterday where they were less than an inch from the side of my car, and the 3rd one took up position smack in the centre of the road, and seemed to relish the fact that he had a long queue of traffic built up behind him, which couldn't possibly get past without wearing him as a bonnet mascot.
I watched a cyclist (no lycra) squeeze up the inside of a line of cars at the lights the other day, the kerb narrows in as the lights are just after a narrow bridge. He could have waited in the gap I'd left in front of me but instead chose to drag the zip on his pannier down the side of the car in front of me, instead. I thought that was nice of him.
I guess the problem is that everyone wants to be going as fast as absolutely possible for whatever mode of transport they're using; cars want to do the limit (or more) always, lorries want to sit on their limiter always (even if there is traffic in front of them, in my experience, so they're 1" from your bumper..), bicycles want to go as fast as their legs will carry them.. all of them can do so but in different situations and rarely if they're on the same stretch of tarmac at the same time.
Nobody has any patience anymore which, I suppose, is the modern affliction.