Using a phone is worse than driving with 80mg/ml alcohol
- … drivers had significantly poorer speed control when using the Hand-held phone than during the other three conditions [including driving with 80 mg/100ml].
- Reaction times were significantly slower for drivers using phones in comparison to when they had alcohol.
- Results showed a tendency for drivers to slow down when talking on Hand-held or Hands-free phones, even when they were specifically instructed to maintain a set speed. [unable to follow instructions] .
- … drivers missed significantly more warnings when they were using a phone.
- There was [sic] also significantly fewer warnings missed by the drivers when they were on alcohol in comparison to when they were using the Hands-free phones. [ie even hands free is worse than driving with 80mg/100ml alcohol]
- The phone drivers were also responding to the wrong warnings more often than the alcohol drivers (false alarms).
- From the subjective mental effort ratings participants made immediately after driving each route, it was clear that they found driving while using a Hand-held phone to be the most difficult.
- … certain aspects of driving performance are impaired more by using a phone than by having a blood alcohol level at the legal limit (80mg/ 100ml).
Driving with 80mg/ml alcohol is worse than using a phone
- ... drivers drove faster than normal when under the influence of alcohol. [and unable to follow instructions]
- When drivers were under the influence of alcohol, they were significantly worse at driving smoothly (standard deviation of lane position) than during the other three conditions.
It is concluded that driving behaviour while talking on a phone is not only worse than normal driving, it can also be described as dangerous.
Although using phones while driving ... can be considered as irresponsible and dangerous, this behaviour is common. Drivers need to be strongly discouraged from engaging in any phone use while behind the wheel.
I fail to see why that is "13ollocks" but perhaps Andy B will join the discussion and tell us why he believes it is "13ollocks"
Sorry John ha-ha, but I have to add my two pennies worth on this one.
If that report was true to life, all the police officers that I know who have to constantly use phone and radio comms when on normal road patrol duties, let alone on blue's and two's, driving at speed, would be constantly crashing due to being "under the influence" of something akin to having had a few pints. Also the Advanced traffic officers who are trained to tactical pursuit level, using comms whilst driving at very high speeds, would certainly be having a constant stream of crashes if that report was true.
No, it is all down to the ability of the driver and their application to the practice of driving whilst being able to concentrate on that skill whilst handling all other mental distractions, such as making and taking hands free comms. All kinds of factors come into that equation, such as age, driving experience, driving application, mental capacity, spacial awareness, and quality of training. Some drivers should never be on the road due to their lack of coordination and their slow reaction speeds , whilst others are gifted, highly trained, with excellent driving disciplines and can well cope with any distractions that come their way.
To use the reports as a blanket judgement that using phones is as dangerous as driving whilst "under the influence" is just plain stupid and wrong.
