Much like the fly during the VP debate, the media seem to prefer picking out derogatory details to belittle the individuals rather than focusing on the substance.
Would it have been reported differently if Giuliani had not been present? Possibly
If the allegations that they raised have any substance, then they have far reaching implications and it would be an affront to EVERYONE who voted in good faith if they aren't thoroughly investigated as the only reason not to do so would be to hide something.
Of course, if the media don't want to acknowledge that, then they may as well have not bothered turning up.
As Giuliani said, there's no point handing the media evidence as they would only ignore it. Apparently he isn't wrong. Besides, the basics are included in the individual filings of each case.