If the universe is infinate (yet growing, can't get my head around that), then it stands to reason that there are infinate other inhabited planets, infinately those with less intelligence than our world (though possibly not Bletchley), and infinately more with more intelligent life.
That's my point though, it isn't infinite. If it was, for example, them the night sky would be lit completely by an infinite number of stars in the same way as you wouldn't be able to see through a dense wood for all the tree trunks. Learnt that in a-level physics
Jon
I accept why the universe is infinate, but growing (just!), but not for your arguement that I think is flawed - we can only see a tiny, tiny proportion of the know stars out there at night. I guess, due to lack of light polution around where I live, I'm lucky enough to see more than a lot of people can, but still only the tiniest proportion of known stars
Yes, I can see your point, and I'm no scientist, but if there were an infinite number of stars out there, they would fill every gap, no matter how far away they were, and the night sky would be completely filled. Believe me, we asked all the same questions as you and it could be that my physics teacher could be wrong, but he learnt it from somewhere, and it follows some sort of logic I think.
It is believed that the universe is expanding away from a single point, the point at which the 'big bang' happened, and that one day, all the matter in the universe will start to slow down and attract by gravity, causing a 'big crunch'. What happens then, ask Steven Hawking
