..and if you thought voting for anyone other than UKIP will bring change, ponder this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmK-f88gcx8&feature=player_embedded

So, despite your antipathy towards Gordon Brown, you would risk allowing him back in by voting for a minority party which stands no chance at all of becoming part of the next government?
Personally, I have no problem whatsoever with the dubious fact that the European Legislature is providing 75% of our laws. Given the makeup of the last House of Commons, they're probably somewhat better at it.
And given Mr. Farrage's immoderate behaviour when representing a British constituency in Europe, I think one would do better to avoid this shower altogether.
Look, we're geographically part of Europe, we're ethnically part of Europe, and since 1974, we've been economically part of Europe. Our national defences would not be viable outside of NATO. Withdrawal from the EU would achieve nothing positive. All our expats would have to come home, all 5m of them. A significant proportion of them would be pensioners who would struggle to get by with the higher cost of living in the UK and would therefore need to avail themselves of the benefit system without actually making any contribution to the economy. On the other hand, all the Eastern European tradesmen and unskilled workers doing all the nasty jobs we are too fastidious to do would have to go back to their countries of origin, leaving us in something of a mess.
So don't waste your vote on UKIP. Vote either Conservative or Lib Dem depending on whichever has the best chance of unseating a Labour candidate.
I live in a safe Conservative constituency. While I prefer the Lib Dem's policies (and leader, for that matter), I shall probably vote Conservative, just to make sure that there's not a surprise Lib Dem surge that allows a situation whereby Labour come back to power.
Well I DO have a problem with the European Legislature making up 75% of our laws. The EU is undemocratic, despite pretensions to the contrary. If we vote for a certain administration here in the UK, it won't make one iota of difference if the majority of laws are passed elsewhere, thus making a mockery of our Parliament. Remember, this is an organisation that for the past 14 or 15 years (can't remember the exact number) has been unable to get off its accounts signed off. If it was a commercial company, it would have long since been subject to investigation.
Secondly, the ex-pats would not be sent home like persona non grata. The fact is that they provide their domiciled country with income. The same goes for trade, no EU company would suddenly stop trading with the UK if we were not in the EU. Besides which, UKIP is calling for a free-trade EU, not the political monstrosity that we now have.
Thirdly a vote for UKIP is NOT a wasted vote. If we all thought that way there would never ever be a change from the two/three party farce we have now. Each party must earn my vote; they do not get it by default. None of them have. I know UKIP won't form a government, but that's not the point. Rather, if they do well, it will send a clear signal to the political classes that the issue of the EU, amongst others, must be addressed.
I want to see the back of Brown as much as anyone else, but don't be fooled that either a Cameron or Clegg administration would be that much different, especially when we are at the beck-and-call of the bureaucrats in Brussels.
I will vote according to my conscience, anything less would be a betrayal.
PS
Nato has nothing to do with the EU. Nato was originally conceived in 1949 and has as much to do with the US as it does with Europe, so has nothing to do with the UKIP policy of leaving the political union of the EU.