controversial I know, but i have a philosophy that driving at low speed is more dangerious than high speed.
I wonder why ![Roll Eyes ::)](http://images.omegaowners.com/forum/smf2000/Smileys/oofstd/rolleyes.gif)
[Rant!]
Generally speaking, people who are alert and intelligent enough to select their own 'SafeSpeed' when taking into account environmental conditions, vehicle conditions and capabilities and driver capabilities at the time are less likely to actually have an accident than those who are blindly adhering to the arbitrary number on the stick and not paying attention because they think it's safe because someone said so!
Sorry, I can't abide all this 'Speed Kills' nonsense! That, coupled with the fact that Greed Scameras haven't effectively done anything to reduce the ammount of those Killed or Seriously Injured on our roads, but the gov't continues to extort monies form drivers who are doing nothing to endanger themselves or others but driving slightly over the +10%+2 threshold upheld by the authorities!!
[/Rant!]
Whilst I agree, the law needs a black and white really. I think we all agree, excessive speed in built up areas does kill - some muppet will walk out into road etc (though I believe in 'survival of fittest', and if some 12yr old can't work out how to cross road safely, then death is best, as with such limited intelligence will cause other problems in life) - open road is probably a different matter. However, and accident at 60mph is often survivable, accidents about 80mph usually aren't.
Also, if you had limits based on abilities, it would be unenforcable, and everyone, including the unexperienced lad who passed his test this morning, would be driving at 100mph (and we all did it
![Wink ;)](http://images.omegaowners.com/forum/smf2000/Smileys/oofstd/wink.gif)
). I have said on here a few times, everyone (esp new drivers) needs a big accident to help them realise how vulnerable they are in a car - its something you cannot teach, it needs personal experience. With many young drivers immediately getting cars, and not having to go through the 'motorbike' thing, it seems younger drivers have less awareness than perhaps those of my generation and beyond have. I think the simulators are a great idea to help them spot potential dangers, although, again, no substitute for being flung over handlebars as some retard walks out on you.
On a seperate note, I was shocked and stunned when I was out with some teenage kids a while ago, and they had no concept of crossing the road - one was playing PSP and just walked out! Aren't kids taught any more - we all knew our Green Cross Code at about 3 or 4yrs??