Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: alfa romeo gt 1.9 jtd  (Read 889 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

unlucky mark mv6

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • tipton,west mids
  • Posts: 1904
    • View Profile
alfa romeo gt 1.9 jtd
« on: 06 January 2011, 18:50:14 »

Whats peoples views on these. :-/
Logged
Machine polishing in west mids £40 also body repairs.pm me for more info.

Omegatoy

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • UK
  • Posts: 3688
    • View Profile
Re: alfa romeo gt 1.9 jtd
« Reply #1 on: 06 January 2011, 19:02:34 »

absolutley stonking engine!! and my chip man has various differnt chips for them!! lol
they seem to have a good grip on the rust isues now, they do drive well for a wrong wheel drive car, mate has one and loves it, not sure on the ld electric problems whether or not they have sorted them or not but he hasnt said anything about it,
weakest part by all accounts is the driveshafts?
thats the sum total of my knowledge of them

unlucky mark mv6

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • tipton,west mids
  • Posts: 1904
    • View Profile
Re: alfa romeo gt 1.9 jtd
« Reply #2 on: 06 January 2011, 19:42:51 »

So definatly worth a shot then in your opinion. :)
Logged
Machine polishing in west mids £40 also body repairs.pm me for more info.

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37573
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: alfa romeo gt 1.9 jtd
« Reply #3 on: 08 January 2011, 13:13:21 »

if Graham rates them, i'd buy one! When looking at flats, one of the estate agents had a Alfa 159 diesel, must say was quite impressed, the interior build was solid. I believe they have a German at head of the company now, it is starting to show!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.009 seconds with 16 queries.