Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: ute update 6/2/10  (Read 3150 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

david_omega

  • Guest
ute update 6/2/10
« on: 06 March 2010, 17:19:57 »



sides fabricated now its back at the welders!
Logged

pedroMV6

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • York
  • Posts: 1207
  • Der Metzgermeister
    • View Profile
Re: ute update 6/2/10
« Reply #1 on: 06 March 2010, 20:38:10 »

Tidy!

Just ordered my new welder, so I'll be cracking on with mine anytime soon. :)
Logged
Loving the Vectra C 2.2 diesel!

Colv

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Edinburgh
  • Posts: 63
  • Elmer who? You're a childs cartoon character ffs!
    • View Profile
Re: ute update 6/2/10
« Reply #2 on: 07 March 2010, 09:06:40 »

Looking good so far!  :y
Can't wait to see the finished article!
Logged

Jim

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Glasgow
  • Posts: 3176
    • Irmscher 3.2 V6 Elite
    • View Profile
    • My Vauxhall Omega's
Re: ute update 6/2/10
« Reply #3 on: 07 March 2010, 09:26:16 »

Are you putting a window in the rear of the cab?
Logged
Vauxhall & Halfords Trade Club Card Holder - Irmscher 3.0 V6 Elite & Irmscher 3.2 V6 Elite

david_omega

  • Guest
Re: ute update 6/2/10
« Reply #4 on: 07 March 2010, 10:56:15 »

oh yes nice rear window. and possibly a universal sunroof, but would only open on the 45 tilt, as their is no longer a car for the roof to slide back into!

am sourcing a front off a 2008 UTE HSV,  not cheap and lots of fabricating, but once finished this will be the nuts
Logged

waspy

  • Guest
Re: ute update 6/2/10
« Reply #5 on: 07 March 2010, 20:30:30 »

Coming along well Simon :y :y
Logged

Sixstring

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Lydney, Gloucestershire
  • Posts: 2127
  • Its just GOTTA be a big V6. Mmm....NOS........
    • View Profile
Re: ute update 6/2/10
« Reply #6 on: 09 March 2010, 14:07:58 »

Mmm, don't like utes in general, but for some strange reason, like this a lot. Cant wait to see more!!
Logged
Self confessed Electro-Mechanical nut, Guitarist/Singer and Motorcyclist. Drives an estate due to all the equipment he has to carry,Electrickery fiddler who loves Automatics and BIG Vee engines.

Hannah Judes Dad

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Cleethorpes North East Lincs
  • Posts: 1933
    • the misses round the bend
    • View Profile
Re: ute update 6/2/10
« Reply #7 on: 09 March 2010, 14:17:59 »

It looks the dogs danglies so far,keep up the good work.  :y
Logged
Don't wee on the electric fence

david_omega

  • Guest
Re: ute update 6/2/10
« Reply #8 on: 09 March 2010, 18:24:58 »

popped to the welders today, did some more body work on it, just deciding how to make the tailgate open, either removable or hinged, hinged requires slicing the bumper tho :(
think will make it one piece and removable!

Also, have tried to get a 2009 front end from australia, its not going well so far, but i will have it some time in the next 3 or 4 weeks!
Logged

The Red Baron

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • burton on trent.staffs
  • Posts: 6178
  • 3.0mv6 sal/3.0elite lpg/2.2dti estate
    • 2000 chipped mv6 3.0l
    • View Profile
Re: ute update 6/2/10
« Reply #9 on: 10 March 2010, 21:14:01 »

doing a good job simon :y
will be nice to see the finished article. ;)
Logged

vauxhall & halfords trade cards.v6 cam locking kit.<local only.

Dan1005

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Bratislava, Slovakia
  • Posts: 109
    • View Profile
Re: ute update 6/2/10
« Reply #10 on: 10 March 2010, 21:21:48 »

Quote
popped to the welders today, did some more body work on it, just deciding how to make the tailgate open, either removable or hinged, hinged requires slicing the bumper tho :(
think will make it one piece and removable!

Also, have tried to get a 2009 front end from australia, its not going well so far, but i will have it some time in the next 3 or 4 weeks!

Might be able to help you there if you want... my family is all still back in Aus and some work at holden dealerships/spares... ;)
Logged

andyc

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Norfolk
  • Posts: 1273
    • View Profile
Re: ute update 6/2/10
« Reply #11 on: 16 March 2010, 09:35:26 »

How are you getting on with putting the car through a SVA test?

Been reading that VOSA are now taking a very dim view of Any Body Shell changes from orginal spec

But it's looking good

Andy
Logged
Iceni Automotive. Classic Vauxhall/Opel Specialist. Service, Repairs, Restoration
Thetford. Norfolk

david_omega

  • Guest
Re: ute update 6/2/10
« Reply #12 on: 16 March 2010, 09:40:11 »

its fine, all legal, and being proffesionaly carried out, not some "up my driveway" project!
Logged

andyc

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Norfolk
  • Posts: 1273
    • View Profile
Re: ute update 6/2/10
« Reply #13 on: 16 March 2010, 09:52:00 »

Just found this . Its been talked about alot on the OMOC.

last thing you want to do is build this and them someone says you can't use it

It'll all a bit grey and even VOSA don't quite know what the hell they are talking about

Sorry if you already know all of this but if not it might be an idea to make a few calls


  There was a debate starting to take shape on a thread about one of our projects, so I thought I'd move it to a relevant section...

Basically it started on the question of whether you can reshell a car with a used shell and retain the original reg or indeed the reg from the used shell.

Technically the answer is no, but of course most people wouldn't think twice about it as long as they own both shells and officially scrap the one that is no longer used.

The real debate is caused when you take this a step down, and consider that according to the DVLA any modification of a monocoque bodyshell from it's original specification would neccessitate an IVA test. Virtually no older car of any type would pass an IVA test even if standard (as the radius edge restrictions would be a major issue - as an example philips head screws holding trim or lights on will fail).

The Accosiation of Car Enthusiasts have been in correspondance with the DVLA and VOSA to try and clarify these rules and the responses are comical!


Quote

Q) Why does cutting into a monococque affect the vehicle identity if it retains the same shape /profile as before.

A) Cutting is considered to be modifying the vehicle from its original specification. Any modification to the chassis/monocoque body is considered to render the vehicle no longer original specification or of original identity.

Q) Is it acceptable to modify a vehicle bulkhead and/or transmission tunnel when performing an engine change or fitting another make?

A) No, Assuming this is in relation to a monocoque structure. This would be considered a modification to the structure.


They then saught more clarification...


Quote

Q) It is the monococque rules that need the most clarification.
Your reply states that any cutting of the monococque" is considered to render the vehicle identity no longer original specification or of original identity ". This would suggest that any crash repairs necessitating cutting and removal of panels or chassis sections, or restoration work would call the vehicle's identity into question?

We presume that the point should really be that any cutting... other than in factory designed joining areas...would be the actual criteria?

A) In this respect it is necessary to differentiate between modification and repair. Any repair process that is in line with manufacturer's recommendations and that returns the structure to its original specification would not be considered to be a modification.

Q) Would the modification of wings to allow clearance for larger wheels fall foul of the regulations?

We presume not as the common fitment of sunroofs does not create issues as this is a non stressed item of the monococque, the same as wings?"

A) When considering a monocoque structure, it is necessary to consider what constitutes cosmetic panels that do not significantly add to the structural strength and which panels provide structural integrity. In general front wings modified in this way would not constitute a modification to the monocoque structure.

With reference to the further query, VOSA have advised that they would prefer the following statement:

What constitutes a monocoque is that of how an OEM manufacturer would view it. The chassis or `cage` assembly and all components that form it, less any cosmetic panels or infills that make no structural consideration to the monocoque or its component parts.
However, we must emphasis that this information is given for general guidance and each case will be judged on its merits.


Essentially the rules mean that anyone carrying out any sort of patch repairs, or any metalwork to a shell other than replacing entire panels to the manufacturers spec is technically modifying the shell and causing it to be liable for an IVA test, which it won't pass!

However, in my view the rules are so open to interpretation that they are rendered meaningless, hence I (and most others) choose to ignore them!

Logged
Iceni Automotive. Classic Vauxhall/Opel Specialist. Service, Repairs, Restoration
Thetford. Norfolk

david_omega

  • Guest
Re: ute update 6/2/10
« Reply #14 on: 16 March 2010, 09:56:40 »

sorry mate, this is a load of irrelevence,   no one has re shelled a car, stop spamming my thread!
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.011 seconds with 17 queries.