News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Main Menu

My Omega Replacement

Started by johndm1957, 19 March 2010, 14:34:24

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

pedroMV6

Depreciation can work well for those of us who can't afford new! :y

About the leather - IIRC, leather interiors as we know them, will have now been made illegal. Summat to do with the processes being highly dangerous.
The leather we used when I did interiors was from China, and made to these new regs - it was like cardboard, scratched easily and smelled horrible. Bit of Gliptone Leather Restorer helped in the smell department, and made it a little more supple, so maybe less likely to crack. ;)
But I digress.............

Why didn't Vauxhall have Caddy CTS as Omega replacement?
I think it's a logical step!
Loving the Vectra C 2.2 diesel!

Monaromega

Well, looking at the Catera, this is its official Successor, so its quite an replacement.

Also, the 2.6 and 3.2 engines where straight from the Omega, the 3.6 is the same engine used by Holden (Alloytec), Plus, the floorpan also is developped at Holden.

So it must be a good car in essence.

johndm1957

QuoteWell, looking at the Catera, this is its official Successor, so its quite an replacement.

Also, the 2.6 and 3.2 engines where straight from the Omega, the 3.6 is the same engine used by Holden (Alloytec), Plus, the floorpan also is developped at Holden.

So it must be a good car in essence.

So what we are saying here is that it really is the Omega's replacement here in the uk, and GM just forgot to tell anyone.

Does this mean we can have a new Cadillac section on the forum?   ;D ;D ;D

CateraMV6

The CTS-V is where its at.. .400hp and a 6spd...

Talk about some M5 competition.

in the states there are tuner companies that can turn out 500-700hp out of these cars making them truly beasts on the road...
2K1 - CCS //Mods: K&N, Steinmetz Cat-back, Port/polish intake system, 3.8BAR FPR, 3.2L Injectors, MAF, V8 Brakes, GTO Springs, 194RWHP.

Del Boy

QuoteThe CTS-V is where its at.. .400hp and a 6spd...
Talk about some M5 competition.

in the states there are tuner companies that can turn out 500-700hp out of these cars making them truly beasts on the road...
It's good but not M5 competition, M5 - 507 BHP 7 speed  :y
Drives: 2013 (13) BMW 530d M Sport Touring, 2011 '61' BMW 520d SE.

fullatherack

#20
Quote
QuoteThe CTS-V is where its at.. .400hp and a 6spd...
Talk about some M5 competition.

in the states there are tuner companies that can turn out 500-700hp out of these cars making them truly beasts on the road...
It's good but not M5 competition, M5 - 507 BHP 7 speedĀ  :y

oooh baby!! :D :y

Del Boy

Quote
Quote
QuoteThe CTS-V is where its at.. .400hp and a 6spd...
Talk about some M5 competition.

in the states there are tuner companies that can turn out 500-700hp out of these cars making them truly beasts on the road...
It's good but not M5 competition, M5 - 507 BHP 7 speedĀ  :y

oooh baby!! :D :y
Thats what the mrs wants next, not at that money, I can't justify that much on one car.
Drives: 2013 (13) BMW 530d M Sport Touring, 2011 '61' BMW 520d SE.

Gabec

1996 2.0-16V CD Saloon, 2001 2.2-16V Auto Elegance Estate

PhilRich

Certainly one to think about as a suitable replacement when the mig has become like rocking horse poo :y
If it ain't broke keep fixing it 'til it is!

MickAP

I like it. :y
Have looked on more than one occasion at these.
What's the fuel consumption like?

Mick ;)

pedroMV6

QuoteI like it. :y
Have looked on more than one occasion at these.
What's the fuel consumption like?

Mick ;)

It ain't gonna be great, that's for sure!!!!! :y

Personally, I wouldn't buy one if I was worried about MPG.
Luckily, I'm not - that's why I drive a thirsty Omega.............
Loving the Vectra C 2.2 diesel!

johndm1957

QuoteI like it. :y
Have looked on more than one occasion at these.
What's the fuel consumption like?

Mick ;)

Not been on a run yet, but did zero the computer, and around town so far 16mpg.

According to Parkers website, 24 mpg overall compared to 23 with my old Elite 3.2.

Power is up at 257bhp vs Omega 213bhp

Top speed lower at 145 vs Omega 149

0-60 a full second quicker, 7 secs vs Omega 8 secs

:y

PhilRich

Quote
QuoteI like it. :y
Have looked on more than one occasion at these.
What's the fuel consumption like?

Mick ;)

Not been on a run yet, but did zero the computer, and around town so far 16mpg.

According to Parkers website, 24 mpg overall compared to 23 with my old Elite 3.2.
Power is up at 257bhp vs Omega 213bhp

Top speed lower at 145 vs Omega 149

0-60 a full second quicker, 7 secs vs Omega 8 secs

:y



That sounds like a very respectable trade-off, given the extra OOmphh, and I don't reckon the difference in top speed would hold up to scrutiny in actual road use, though where you would be able to crank it up beyond 140 on the Queens Highway to do a comparison, I do not know?  ;D ;D ;D :y
 
If it ain't broke keep fixing it 'til it is!

Kumamoto

Lovely looking motor....i must think ahead becuase like you i have had 3 miggies over the last 8 years.

Monaromega

Quote
QuoteWell, looking at the Catera, this is its official Successor, so its quite an replacement.

Also, the 2.6 and 3.2 engines where straight from the Omega, the 3.6 is the same engine used by Holden (Alloytec), Plus, the floorpan also is developped at Holden.

So it must be a good car in essence.

So what we are saying here is that it really is the Omega's replacement here in the uk, and GM just forgot to tell anyone.

Well no, it is only in US its replacement, you had the Monaro coupe and now the VXR8. ;)

We on the otherhand (ze germans), have no replacement at all for it.