Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Better performance?  (Read 3270 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mkaminski100

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Basingstoke
  • Posts: 595
    • View Profile
Better performance?
« on: 24 November 2007, 22:43:36 »

http://www.ecotekplc.com/more_cars_18.htm What is that for? How does it work? Has anyone used it?
It looks like that magic thing is being installed on small breather hose. In "How to do it" section they showed Vectra X20XEV, not Omega engine, and smaller breather pipe joins throttle body on the side (not the suction manifold as in Omega)
Logged

Nickbat

  • Guest
Re: Better performance?
« Reply #1 on: 25 November 2007, 01:45:53 »

This is the product homepage:

http://www.ecotekvalve.co.uk/?gclid=CMPhtNrv9o8CFQgsQwodPCqNKg

Don't know much about it myself, I'll be interested to hear other members' comments
Logged

IrmscherKris

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Manchester
  • Posts: 433
  • banned due to bad trader references
    • View Profile
Re: Better performance?
« Reply #2 on: 25 November 2007, 02:02:32 »

A phsycological-real-object thingy you put on your motor and then believe its giving you better MPG... You just end up driving more economical and then think you've had a bargain.

Company's praying on concerned motorists who are worrying about the rising cost of fuel.
« Last Edit: 25 November 2007, 02:03:02 by irmscherkris »
Logged

magnul

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Trondheim, Norway
  • Posts: 157
    • View Profile
Re: Better performance?
« Reply #3 on: 25 November 2007, 02:26:37 »

Amen! Just snake oil.
Logged

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: Better performance?
« Reply #4 on: 25 November 2007, 10:37:27 »

Sounds like a load of Jimbob plums
Logged

mkaminski100

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Basingstoke
  • Posts: 595
    • View Profile
Re: Better performance?
« Reply #5 on: 25 November 2007, 13:17:23 »

Same thing as Petrol Magnetizer... I was wondering how can you improve performance by adding a valve on breather pipe.
« Last Edit: 25 November 2007, 13:17:33 by mkaminski100 »
Logged

Nickbat

  • Guest
Re: Better performance?
« Reply #6 on: 25 November 2007, 15:16:55 »

From what I've discovered, inlet air turbulence is a good thing and already well understood. However, these after-market products are not thought to be worthwhile. Any engineers out there may well understand this article better than me:

http://www.fuelsaving.info/turbulence.htm
Logged

MartinP

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Dudley
  • Posts: 605
    • BMW 320D
    • View Profile
Re: Better performance?
« Reply #7 on: 25 November 2007, 15:44:27 »

I had one of these  :-[

used it on a 940 2.0 Volvo  :)

It is less effective on petrol injection engines than on carburettor models, it is supposed to collapse the vacuum in the inlet manifold to stop it drawing petrol into the engine when not accelerating.

Made a rasping noise as the manifold vented on the overun.

I found minimal if any benifits and donated it to my daugthers boyfriend, who is a knob!

it only cost £35 7 years ago!
« Last Edit: 25 November 2007, 15:47:20 by issunaz »
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36416
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Better performance?
« Reply #8 on: 25 November 2007, 21:48:29 »

Total snake oil. Introduces an air leak which will not help at all.

A fuel injected engine doesn't rely on manifold vacuum to suck fuel into the system so this will make no difference whatsoever. Your ECU already cuts fuel completely when decelerating.

The air leak will confuse the injection system which relys on an accurate measurement of airflow into the engine via the MAF sensor. Adding this device will therefore likely cause worse fuel consumption and may even flag a fault in the ECU.

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36416
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Better performance?
« Reply #9 on: 25 November 2007, 21:56:07 »

Quote
who is a knob!

Perfect candidate for one of these devices then.

I just read their patent and it's all based on testing with a carburretor engined car. Remember those?

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: Better performance?
« Reply #10 on: 25 November 2007, 22:12:37 »

Quote
Quote
who is a knob!

Perfect candidate for one of these devices then.

I just read their patent and it's all based on testing with a carburretor engined car. Remember those?

Kevin

Last carb car I had only had 1 extra on the manifold and that was a brake servo pipe. Mind you I never did the Vizard mod to the twin Strombergs (grabbed from a scrap Avenger), so never got it over 115bhp.

I was broke at that period
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36416
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Better performance?
« Reply #11 on: 25 November 2007, 22:37:02 »

Some carbs used to have a little poppet valve in the throttle plate which popped open during periods of high manifold vacuum to add a little extra air. This did reduce the fuel flow during overrun but also ensured it had enough air to burn readily, improving emissions. Basically, a more elegant solution to the same problem. Only relevant to carbs, though. A modern FI system is a different beast.

A mate of mine used to have an Avenger Tiger with a pair of strombergs on. I have a feeling he ended up with a pair of 45DCOEs on it after that too. Went like a rocket. Happy days :)

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: Better performance?
« Reply #12 on: 25 November 2007, 22:44:14 »

Quote
Some carbs used to have a little poppet valve in the throttle plate which popped open during periods of high manifold vacuum to add a little extra air. This did reduce the fuel flow during overrun but also ensured it had enough air to burn readily, improving emissions. Basically, a more elegant solution to the same problem. Only relevant to carbs, though. A modern FI system is a different beast.

A mate of mine used to have an Avenger Tiger with a pair of strombergs on. I have a feeling he ended up with a pair of 45DCOEs on it after that too. Went like a rocket. Happy days :)

Kevin


When money came better I went to a Carlton. If I had kept the Sunbeam I was going to convert to unleaded and possibly EFI it, it was already running halogens, 4 speaker stereo, and uprated suspension.

Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36416
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Better performance?
« Reply #13 on: 25 November 2007, 23:07:40 »

Sounds like it would have been a great candidate for a Megasquirt.

http://www.megasquirt.info/

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

dippydave

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Sutton Coldfield, West Mids
  • Posts: 617
  • how personal?
    • Vectra 2.0DTi Elite
    • View Profile
Re: Better performance?
« Reply #14 on: 26 November 2007, 19:39:14 »

pardon my ignorance, but what is snake oil? a drink? an additive? a lubricant?!!! :-/
Logged
Vectra Elite Estate doing good post-Omega service but still not as nice to sit in.

One last Omega on the drive, one Corsa on the lawn...maybe they'll go to a good home before too long!
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.01 seconds with 16 queries.