Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: low pressure turbo'ing of a 3.2 lump....  (Read 2423 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ngrainqey

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • rotherham
  • Posts: 2193
    • BMW E92, 2.6 CD F/L Est.
    • View Profile
low pressure turbo'ing of a 3.2 lump....
« on: 12 February 2012, 09:55:24 »

lol you can all see where im going...
i fancy buying a 3.2 lump to turbo-since it has a forged crank
where could i get forged rods for it from? may as well look at decomp pistons too lol
i had the idea of chopping the dp where the precats are and fitting a small turbo at each side instead :P

anybody fancy humouring me and pointing me towards some conrods?
thanks
alex
Logged
V8!!!!

F1 9LFG

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • nr Braintree, Essex
  • Posts: 449
    • View Profile
Re: low pressure turbo'ing of a 3.2 lump....
« Reply #1 on: 12 February 2012, 09:57:47 »

I looked into something like this, I stopped when I was told by just about everyone that cooling would be a big problem...?

Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: low pressure turbo'ing of a 3.2 lump....
« Reply #3 on: 12 February 2012, 10:12:06 »

I looked into something like this, I stopped when I was told by just about everyone that cooling would be a big problem...?

cooling issues can be solved , but bottom end will start problem after.. :-\
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Logged

feeutfo

  • Guest
Re: low pressure turbo'ing of a 3.2 lump....
« Reply #5 on: 12 February 2012, 13:23:01 »

Bottom end is the concern. They wear from stock. So don't take much more extra poke reliably.
Logged

Ken T

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Stockport
  • Posts: 2269
    • View Profile
Logged
I used to be indecisive; now I'm not so sure...

GmasterT

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Cambridge
  • Posts: 388
  • does that drifting thing...
    • View Profile
Re: low pressure turbo'ing of a 3.2 lump....
« Reply #7 on: 12 February 2012, 14:23:03 »

Ive thought about this, but I dont think its worth the effort of around 5psi on the eqivilent of 2 T25's.

Vs the weight of intercoolers, rads etc. Also look at Saabs blown version of the 3.0. I think that had sodium valves.. Id also avoid the Vid 1 type turbo in the bay and stick them/it by the gearbox (latest trend in US etc) and to use the standard inlet trunking with the supercharger is beyond daft :D

Id either use a Z28NET or C20LET tbh, or ITBs depending on what power you wanted :)
Logged

GmasterT

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Cambridge
  • Posts: 388
  • does that drifting thing...
    • View Profile
Re: low pressure turbo'ing of a 3.2 lump....
« Reply #9 on: 12 February 2012, 15:44:46 »

Agreed, I love the RB, but its not the best candidate, 1JZ is outstanding for the money... But again, lots of weight in front of the front axle with the straight 6 iron block and intercoolers etc.

Anyway, the op question was about low pressure...you may see 50bhp or so safely, which you would on itbs imo.
Logged

ngrainqey

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • rotherham
  • Posts: 2193
    • BMW E92, 2.6 CD F/L Est.
    • View Profile
Re: low pressure turbo'ing of a 3.2 lump....
« Reply #10 on: 12 February 2012, 18:33:05 »

i looked at running a z28net lump, how come the z28net engines cranks cope where as the ye32 doesnt?
..i couldnt be arsed with the engine management on a z28net as its a later motronic and dont know if the looms would integrate between m3.0 and m4.4 or whatever the z28net uses
...if anybody knows then let me know :P

alex
Logged
V8!!!!

GmasterT

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Cambridge
  • Posts: 388
  • does that drifting thing...
    • View Profile
Re: low pressure turbo'ing of a 3.2 lump....
« Reply #11 on: 12 February 2012, 19:36:44 »

I dont think its the crank that is the weak point to be honest and the Z28 is a completley different engine with had turboing in mind from the offset, its also a 60 degree Vee as opposed to a 90 (iirc, Ive asked a similar question before)

As for management, I wouldnt bother trying to use the standard stuff and fit a standalone like an SC Typhoon or Link etc. iirc you can get a different board for the earlier motronic, or can play with the chip or reflash the later ones, but youd be too limited to run boost safley imo :)
Logged

ngrainqey

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • rotherham
  • Posts: 2193
    • BMW E92, 2.6 CD F/L Est.
    • View Profile
Re: low pressure turbo'ing of a 3.2 lump....
« Reply #12 on: 12 February 2012, 21:27:46 »

i thought the omega was a 54 degree Vee?
Logged
V8!!!!

Latchie_3.0v6

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • OMAGH N.IRELAND
  • Posts: 178
    • Omega 3.0 v6 elite (sold)
    • View Profile
Logged
The only way forward is sideways

2woody

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Northumberland
  • Posts: 2374
    • View Profile
Re: low pressure turbo'ing of a 3.2 lump....
« Reply #14 on: 13 February 2012, 10:11:31 »

you're right - Z28 is a totally different engine - a conwentional 60 degree, as opposed to the Omega B's 54 degree V6.

This is partly the reason why conrods are difficult to get, because the 54 degree crankshaft has six different big-end journals, unlike a conwentional vee engine.

Swindon Race Engines used to do a racing version of the 3 litre engine, which will surely have had different rods.

budget about £400 per rod.

for what it's worth, I think the cooling problems are fixable - it's really about reducing the normal running temperature
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 16 queries.