Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Would have voted for the bill

10 (21.3%)

Would have voted against the bill

30 (63.8%)

Dont know

3 (6.4%)

Mind your own business,I was never confused

4 (8.5%)

Total Members Voted: 35

Voting closed: 08 February 2013, 20:38:34

[Vamps]

I wonder is there any Gay OOF members on here ? ...Personally i'm against it, The thought of 2 men together is sickening to say the least 2 women hmmm 

Are you a newbie?.............

On a more serious note, I am sitting on the fence, leaning towards no......

[plym ian]

gay marriage you can shove that where the sun don't shine

but seriously as long as they don't bother me let them get on with it each to there own

and no matter what the bible says we can't hide behind religion all the time

[Vamps]

gay marriage you can shove that where the sun don't shine

but seriously as long as they don't bother me let them get on with it each to there own

and no matter what the bible says we can't hide behind religion all the time

So, a total contradiction then.....

[bigegg]

I voted yes.
Puffs have as much right to be miserable as anyone else.

[plym ian]

gay marriage you can shove that where the sun don't shine

but seriously as long as they don't bother me let them get on with it each to there own

and no matter what the bible says we can't hide behind religion all the time

So, a total contradiction then.....

yes quite so

god I'm so confused

[Vamps]

gay marriage you can shove that where the sun don't shine

but seriously as long as they don't bother me let them get on with it each to there own

and no matter what the bible says we can't hide behind religion all the time

So, a total contradiction then.....

yes quite so

god I'm so confused

Another puddled oofer.....

[OmegaAnglesey]

I wonder is there any Gay OOF members on here ? ...Personally i'm against it, The thought of 2 men together is sickening to say the least 2 women hmmm 

Are you a newbie?.............

On a more serious note, I am sitting on the fence, leaning towards no......

umm I'm not familiar with anyone's arrangements in this department gay or otherwise unless you mean that banter about gold Omegas some time ago ? 

[paul.lovejoy]

wifeys had me watching channel 4 and 5 latley, so my life has been quite gay ( you try prizing the remote from wifeys grip, would not mind if it was my willie)

this has me asking allsorts of questions now looking at who started the post i do remeber something brushing my booty when i was putting some parts in my car during my last vist

[cleggy]

I voted against,nuff said

+ 1   

+2     

It's a queer old world

[albitz]

Rods2 pretty much said what I would have said.I couldnt care less what consenting adults do with/to each other,and if they want to make a long term commitment,then civil partnerships seems like a sensible option.
Marriage however,has been between a man and woman,the world over for centuries.It has always been the basis of society - man/woman get married,procreate,become mum and dad,and their kids grow up and do the same.Its altering the fundamentals of society even further than has already been done in recent times,and I wonder what will become of society in the future.
I also dont believe for one minute that Churches etc. will be able to remain exempt in the long term.Once we have got used to this situation it wont be long before there is a test case in the European court and Churches will have to perform same sex marriages or face being shut down just as Catholic adoption agencies have had to face closure ratherthan accept same sex adoption.
Interesting to see Nicks EU angle on this,it seems all roads lead back to Brussells on way or another.Its also abvious that Camoron is trying to get himself into the pink voting sector which the other two parties have kept the Tories frozen out from historically.
I think he may actually be more cynical and self serving (but less competent) than Bliar.
The media (BBC in particular) have been preaching to us for the last week or so that public opinion was overwhelmingly in favour of a yes vote.I can only imagine that the polls were conducted in the Gaurdian canteen.

[Lazydocker]

I wonder is there any Gay OOF members on here ? ...Personally i'm against it, The thought of 2 men together is sickening to say the least 2 women hmmm 

So, 2 gay men is sickening but 2 gay women is acceptable?  

[albitz]

One of natures little contradictions,so it seems.

[OmegaAnglesey]

I wonder is there any Gay OOF members on here ? ...Personally i'm against it, The thought of 2 men together is sickening to say the least 2 women hmmm 

So, 2 gay men is sickening but 2 gay women is acceptable?  

no offence intended , hmmm could mean many things, "hmmm outrageous" "hmmm dreadful" "hmmm ?"   

[Lazydocker]

I wonder is there any Gay OOF members on here ? ...Personally i'm against it, The thought of 2 men together is sickening to say the least 2 women hmmm 

So, 2 gay men is sickening but 2 gay women is acceptable?  

no offence intended , hmmm could mean many things, "hmmm outrageous" "hmmm dreadful" "hmmm ?"   

You haven't offended me, just highlighting the "Flaw" in your argument

[mantahatch]

My tuppence worth. Many people are not religious but still marry in church to be seen to be doing the right thing. If we accept that religion is more a business than anything else then the church surely has the right to deal with customers how it likes. At the end of the day no business has to deal with anyone it does not wish to deal with. So if you make a law stating someone can use a business by law then that has to be an unfair in my book. Pubs often refuse to serve some people, clubs refuse entry, shops can also refuse to serve people, banks don't have to give you an account.
So why should the church be "forced" to serve anyone who demands it ?