Well that took re-reading, I initially read it as ' If corroboration evidence was provided for one offence then others of a similar nature were assume to be corroborated' but it would appear that a number of offences of the same nature corroborate one another.
This does seem rather against the grain considering the amount of publicity attached to these cases, and further "victims" coming forward after the fact and in some cases known to each other.
We must await the judicial process and it's outcome. I have my opinions considering the time and the fame of the accused and that I think the charges should be thrown out of court simply because of lack of evidence and that no crimes were reported at the time. It was not a crime to touch or flirt and if the said victim was offended a slap in the chops usually set things right. Minors are a different matter altogether
Saville is a different matter altogether, but he is not here to be taken to book only for the real victims to have some satisfaction. As for those jumping on the bandwagon, shame on them I hope they get nothing because any compensation will come from public funds.
Author
Topic: Savile: A year later ........ (Read 2625 times)