Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: not a bad result!!  (Read 2071 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

symes

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • oxford
  • Posts: 3488
  • Madness is a state of i dont mind
    • R reg 940 volvo
    • View Profile
not a bad result!!
« on: 03 March 2012, 22:43:25 »
This morning stripped cam covers to do the gaskets and put in G cams(got a set of 4 last month) But when covers were off-Had G cams in already-wow saved me extra work :y
Logged
1998 volvo 940 turbo 225bhp +1965 Rover 5000 v8+ 1962 ford consul 375 lowrider

albitz

  • Guest
Re: not a bad result!!
« Reply #1 on: 03 March 2012, 22:45:44 »
Bet that was a bit of a shock. :o ;D
Logged

symes

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • oxford
  • Posts: 3488
  • Madness is a state of i dont mind
    • R reg 940 volvo
    • View Profile
Re: not a bad result!!
« Reply #2 on: 03 March 2012, 23:00:30 »
just a bit - but now got spare cams- Not very often I get a nice surprise usually get expensive nasty ones-  :y
Logged
1998 volvo 940 turbo 225bhp +1965 Rover 5000 v8+ 1962 ford consul 375 lowrider

albitz

  • Guest
Re: not a bad result!!
« Reply #3 on: 03 March 2012, 23:18:23 »
Me too. :y ;D
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: not a bad result!!
« Reply #4 on: 03 March 2012, 23:18:40 »
do they effect the idle ?
Logged

symes

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • oxford
  • Posts: 3488
  • Madness is a state of i dont mind
    • R reg 940 volvo
    • View Profile
Re: not a bad result!!
« Reply #5 on: 03 March 2012, 23:22:27 »
not that I noticed-had thought it was a bit sporty for an estate as far as performance is concerned. :y
Logged
1998 volvo 940 turbo 225bhp +1965 Rover 5000 v8+ 1962 ford consul 375 lowrider

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: not a bad result!!
« Reply #6 on: 03 March 2012, 23:32:14 »
Quote from: symes on 03 March 2012, 23:22:27
not that I noticed-had thought it was a bit sporty for an estate as far as performance is concerned. :y

so good news.. soon mines also will go in..thanks :y
 
Logged

Vamps

  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bishop Middleham, Co Durham.
  • Posts: 24708
  • Flying Tonight, so Be Prepared.
    • Mig 2.6CDX and 2.2 Honda
    • View Profile
Re: not a bad result!!
« Reply #7 on: 04 March 2012, 01:18:38 »
Sorry but what are G cams?...... :-[ :-[
Logged

feeutfo

  • Guest
Re: not a bad result!!
« Reply #8 on: 04 March 2012, 01:41:00 »
Quote from: Vamps on 04 March 2012, 01:18:38
Sorry but what are G cams?...... :-[ :-[
More g-gees. ;)
Logged

feeutfo

  • Guest
Re: not a bad result!!
« Reply #9 on: 04 March 2012, 01:42:14 »
Quote from: chrisgixer on 04 March 2012, 01:41:00
Quote from: Vamps on 04 March 2012, 01:18:38
Sorry but what are G cams?...... :-[ :-[
More g-gees. ;)
although some models already have them. :)
Logged

Vamps

  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bishop Middleham, Co Durham.
  • Posts: 24708
  • Flying Tonight, so Be Prepared.
    • Mig 2.6CDX and 2.2 Honda
    • View Profile
Re: not a bad result!!
« Reply #10 on: 04 March 2012, 01:56:13 »
Quote from: chrisgixer on 04 March 2012, 01:42:14
Quote from: chrisgixer on 04 March 2012, 01:41:00
Quote from: Vamps on 04 March 2012, 01:18:38
Sorry but what are G cams?...... :-[ :-[
More g-gees. ;)
although some models already have them. :)

Thanks, so might our 2.6 have them? how do you tell without lifting the rockers off? surly they must be part of the original spec and therefore mentioned somewhere in the paperwork..... :-\ :-\
Logged

albitz

  • Guest
Re: not a bad result!!
« Reply #11 on: 04 March 2012, 09:10:25 »
3.0 has them, 2.5 doesnt. whether its similar for 3.2/2.6 Im not sure.Serek might be the best person to ask.He seems very well informed on such things. ;)
Logged

omega3000

  • Guest
Re: not a bad result!!
« Reply #12 on: 04 March 2012, 09:15:42 »
Quote from: Albs on 04 March 2012, 09:10:25
3.0 has them, 2.5 doesnt. whether its similar for 3.2/2.6 Im not sure.Serek might be the best person to ask.He seems very well informed on such things. ;)

Yeah  :P :P

How much the G cams going for now ?
Logged

albitz

  • Guest
Re: not a bad result!!
« Reply #13 on: 04 March 2012, 09:17:56 »
Around £75 a set is probably the going rate imo. :y
Logged

omega3000

  • Guest
Re: not a bad result!!
« Reply #14 on: 04 March 2012, 09:21:57 »
Quote from: Albs on 04 March 2012, 09:17:56
Around £75 a set is probably the going rate imo. :y

Thats cheap , just had a peep on ebay and cant see any but have seen many pulled out of scrap cars down the local scrap yards ...seems its the first thing folks are after  ;)
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 17 queries.