The issue, in my mind, is that, for people on benefits, there appear to be no financial consequences of having children. You simply have as many as you like and the state pays you to look after them.
That is unfair, IMHO, because, back in the real world, where most of us live, there are very real financial consequences to face when considering starting a family, let alone having this many offspring. Feeding and clothing kids is expensive, giving up work to look after them is expensive, providing childcare if you don't give up work is expensive, and providing accommodation for them to live in is expensive, etc.. etc...
I know nothing about this particular lady's position so I'm not going to comment on what might be a load of trumped-up journalistic nonsense, but I know what sacrifices I'd have to make if Mrs. KW and I wanted to support 11 children, and I wonder what sacrifices she's made, especially as a single mother?
I also wonder if her actually ever finding work which will pay for childcare, accommodation, food, etc. for her children is possible? If not, surely the benefits system has put her in a position that has left her permanently living off taxpayer's money?