At that budget, you are looking at either stuff that won't last, or stuff where the ink is so expensive, you'll be forced to use pattern ink, and thus it won't last.
So buy whatever floats your boat. It won't last. Sorry.
my last one lasted just over 2 years which isn't bad for a cheap Kodak printer. And what sort of printer would you suggest TB out of curiosity. 
I do not know your requirements, so cannot make a recommendation without further info.
Irrelevent now, as hopefully your new one will serve you well
. Note pattern ink may invalidate warranty, double check before using it.
i just need a printer for printing text on plain old A4 paper and rarely printing pictures and use the scanner for documents... Will take the patern ink advice under advisement but I doubt Rob would recommend them If they weren't good 
Indeed.
There are some reasonable pattern inks, and there are some really bad ones (and some really bad "genuine" ones on your beloved Amazon (admittedly Marketplace)). Trouble is, the scammers are now even cloning the "branded" pattern inks, as there is money to be made, and this has infected the entire supply chain. The seller won't know if its genuine pattern ink, or the cheap scammed stuff pretending to be higher quality pattern. Its a minefield.
Epsons have life heads, unlike others such as HP, where the heads are part of the cartridge. A blocked head means a new printer (not viable to replace head). Both viewpoints have their own pros and cons, neither is better/worse.
For your purposes, I would have considered a low cost mono laser, and a seperate scanner if required, though that might have been over budget.
For info, as well as my Laserjet, I currently use an Epson PX730WD, after the demise of the PX700W I had before (due to clogged tubes, after pattern ink

), which I would recommend if people need a photo all-in-one with CD printing capability.