Even so, the predicted travel times really don't justify the cost
Its not just the travel times.
The current routes which it would support are currently at capacity and freight is suffering as a result (not enough paths).
By moving passenger services to high speed rail, you create further paths for lower speed services such as local stoppers and freight. This helps to take lorries off the road for long runs and improves servies to smaller towns.
Its all about the big picture and better we spend money on infrastructure then ineffecient services where money is not the real issue.
But hey, the press have no understanding of such things because its just to hard (and does not sell papers!)
Indeed Mark, and that is my argument.

But you are right, it is far more commercial for the papers to condemn it all regardless of the facts and looking ahead 25 - 50 years!
Freight is important to the Chunnel, and if I was in power, I would be strongly supporting the creation for HS freight trains. Freight trains have been the real bread and butter for most lines since the start of the railway revolution, and fast freight of particularly perishables changed life in the cities forever. HS freight from and to Europe would open markets we can hardly imagine now, getting product from far afield in the factories / warehouses / shops same day /next day.
The future is fast, the future is high speed train!
