Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Which car  (Read 1277 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tombo5609

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Cheshire
  • Posts: 3
    • Mercedes E270
    • View Profile
Which car
« on: 05 June 2013, 08:15:59 »

Hi, As a newbie to this forum and a prospective buyer of an Omega, could I ask the advice of more knowledgeable members.
My old Mercedes tow car has finally given up the ghost and I am looking for an Omega to take its place. I am however a bit overwhelmed by the choice.
I shall be towing a medium sized caravan so need something with a bit of grunt, but what?
I would appreciate your advice as there are a number on ebay at the moment.
I suppose what is just as important is what to stay clear of.

Tom

If any member has anything with a tow bar in the 6oo pound range then let me know.
Logged

henryd

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • west cornwall
  • Posts: 8767
  • VW Touareg R5 tdi Auto
    • View Profile
Re: Which car
« Reply #1 on: 05 June 2013, 09:22:46 »

If you are towing a pikey wagon I would go with a 3lt or 3.2lt v6 or a chipped manual 2.5TD,I found my 2.5 v6 Auto lacked torque when towing,possibly manual 2.5 v6 would fare better :y
Logged
other rides 
  mk3 Volvo v70 2.0 Diesel ,Citroen C2, Pug 306 cabriolet
  Sterling elite trekker pikey wagon

slowboy

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • lode
  • Posts: 354
    • View Profile
Re: Which car
« Reply #2 on: 05 June 2013, 09:36:32 »

yes henryd :y
Logged

tigers_gonads

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Kinston Upon Hull
  • Posts: 8592
  • Driving a Honda CR-V which doesn't smell of pee
    • Honda CR-V
    • View Profile
Re: Which car
« Reply #3 on: 05 June 2013, 10:15:37 »

Manual 2.5 will do the job  :y

If you want a auto, 3lt or 3.2 will be better.
The ar35 auto box that is fitted to the above is stronger.

Might be better to lpg the bigger engines if you have a auto box because they like a drink  ;)
Logged

Doctor Gollum

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • In a colds and darks puddleses
  • Posts: 28300
  • If you can't eat them, join them...
    • Feetses.
    • View Profile
Re: Which car
« Reply #4 on: 05 June 2013, 13:35:47 »

3.0 or the (far superior imo) 3.2. If your towing.  Over 200hp with these.

The2.5 TD has a ar25 box which struggles to cope with the torque of the engine. Towing will worsen that I would think. Easily fixed by fitting an ar35 box and then you can chip it. But you may not want that agro.

Defo want a v6 IMO.
Logged
Onanists always think outside the box.

taitinson

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Sunny Cornwall
  • Posts: 189
    • 03 2.6 CDX Estate
    • View Profile
Re: Which car
« Reply #5 on: 05 June 2013, 15:25:09 »

I have a 2003 2.6 V6 auto and it towed my old 24ft twin wheel caravan no problem
Logged

tombo5609

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Cheshire
  • Posts: 3
    • Mercedes E270
    • View Profile
Re: Which car
« Reply #6 on: 05 June 2013, 18:41:32 »

I have a 2003 2.6 V6 auto and it towed my old 24ft twin wheel caravan no problem
[/quote

Thankyou all for all the advice. I was gong to ask about the 2.6.
I have just changed my van from a twin axle 25ft  to a 17ft single axle so the weight problem is not such an issue as before.
What are your thoughts on the 2.2?. there are plenty of nice examples around. I am following one on ebay at the moment.?

Tom.
Logged

bigegg

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Leeds
  • Posts: 1218
    • MV6 RIP - Lexus GS300 '99
    • View Profile
Re: Which car
« Reply #7 on: 05 June 2013, 19:05:30 »


Thankyou all for all the advice. I was gong to ask about the 2.6.
I have just changed my van from a twin axle 25ft  to a 17ft single axle so the weight problem is not such an issue as before.
What are your thoughts on the 2.2?. there are plenty of nice examples around. I am following one on ebay at the moment.?

Tom.

A 2.2 will tow a caravan, but it won't enjoy it, and neither will you!
if nothing else, you'll have your foot to the floor most of the time, just to keep up with any flow of traffic - this will mean you'll get about 8mpg.
Get a 2.5/2.6, or better still a 3.0/3.2 - the extra power will mean that you'll get 15-20mpg *at least*.

Even without the caravan, and assuming you don't "drive like a tool", the economy won't be much different. (mid to high 20s) - plus, (on suitable private land, of course  8) ) you'll have the option to "drive like a tool"

I also, personally, believe that the 2.2 engine is not as reliable as the v6

« Last Edit: 05 June 2013, 19:07:55 by bigegg »
Logged
Carpe Incendium

Field Marshal Dr. Opti

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Utopia
  • Posts: 31699
  • Speaking sense, not Woke PC crap
    • View Profile
Re: Which car
« Reply #8 on: 05 June 2013, 19:15:46 »


Thankyou all for all the advice. I was gong to ask about the 2.6.
I have just changed my van from a twin axle 25ft  to a 17ft single axle so the weight problem is not such an issue as before.
What are your thoughts on the 2.2?. there are plenty of nice examples around. I am following one on ebay at the moment.?

Tom.

A 2.2 will tow a caravan, but it won't enjoy it, and neither will you!
if nothing else, you'll have your foot to the floor most of the time, just to keep up with any flow of traffic - this will mean you'll get about 8mpg.
Get a 2.5/2.6, or better still a 3.0/3.2 - the extra power will mean that you'll get 15-20mpg *at least*.

Even without the caravan, and assuming you don't "drive like a tool", the economy won't be much different. (mid to high 20s) - plus, (on suitable private land, of course  8) ) you'll have the option to "drive like a tool"

I also, personally, believe that the 2.2 engine is not as reliable as the v6


.......and is missing two cylinders. :)
Logged

symes

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • oxford
  • Posts: 3488
  • Madness is a state of i dont mind
    • R reg 940 volvo
    • View Profile
Re: Which car
« Reply #9 on: 05 June 2013, 19:20:07 »


Thankyou all for all the advice. I was gong to ask about the 2.6.
I have just changed my van from a twin axle 25ft  to a 17ft single axle so the weight problem is not such an issue as before.
What are your thoughts on the 2.2?. there are plenty of nice examples around. I am following one on ebay at the moment.?

Tom.

A 2.2 will tow a caravan, but it won't enjoy it, and neither will you!
if nothing else, you'll have your foot to the floor most of the time, just to keep up with any flow of traffic - this will mean you'll get about 8mpg.
Get a 2.5/2.6, or better still a 3.0/3.2 - the extra power will mean that you'll get 15-20mpg *at least*.

Even without the caravan, and assuming you don't "drive like a tool", the economy won't be much different. (mid to high 20s) - plus, (on suitable private land, of course  8) ) you'll have the option to "drive like a tool"

I also, personally, believe that the 2.2 engine is not as reliable as the v6


2-2 and dbw v6 are on par as reliability goes-loads on here with cat/throttle probs dbw=dont bloomin work-cable much better :y
Logged
1998 volvo 940 turbo 225bhp +1965 Rover 5000 v8+ 1962 ford consul 375 lowrider
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 18 queries.